The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.
Abstract
The relation between people's confidence in the accuracy of an erroneous response and their later performance was investigated. Most models of human memory suggest that the higher a person's confidence, the stronger the item (in the context of the eliciting cue) that is retrieved from memory. In recall, stronger associates to a cue interfere with competing associates more than do weaker associates. This state of affairs implies that errors endorsed with high, rather than low, confidence should be more difficult to correct by learning the correct response feedback. In contrast to the authors' expectations, highly confident errors were the most likely to be corrected in a subsequent retest. Participants nearly always endorsed the correct response in cases in which both the correct response and the original erroneous response were generated at retest, suggesting that people possess a refined metacognitive ability to know what is correct and incorrect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also evidence that greater attention is given to feedback that does not match expectations (e.g., Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001;Fazio & Marsh, 2009)”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001
In the citing paper
“The authors suggested that this effect is due to the corrective feedback being more surprising for high-confidence errors than for low-confidence errors, and that the ensuing increased arousal facilitates encoding of the correct answer.”
From Predicting as a learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001
In the citing paper
“The hypercorrection effect refers to the finding that erroneous responses committed with high confidence are more likely to be corrected than erroneous responses committed with low confidence (Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001).”
From Predicting as a learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001
Citations
Cites
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 6,035
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”
Ford, G. G. (2000) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781482274400-4 · Cited by 4,258
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.93 · Cited by 1,696
The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592 · Cited by 1,659
A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,546
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
American Psychological Association (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.12.1597 · Cited by 1,362
Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033773 · Cited by 820
The Psychology of Human Learning
Newman, E. B., McGeoch, J. A., & Irion, A. L. (1953) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418975 · Cited by 793
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Loftus, 1979, Eyewitness testimony.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468
Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model
Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsl013 · Cited by 681
Self-citationMetcalfe, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022 · Cited by 615
Self-citationFeedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.3.604 · Cited by 457
When Does Feedback Facilitate Learning of Words?
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3 · Cited by 445
Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 · Cited by 361
Surprised–curious–confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.
Vogl, E., Pekrun, R. H., Murayama, K., & Stockinger, K. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000578 · Cited by 274
Timing matters when correcting fake news
Brashier, N. M., Pennycook, G., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2020043118 · Cited by 216
Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom
de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Gog, T. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.003 · Cited by 197
The benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166
Greve, A., Cooper, E., Tibon, R., & Henson, R. N. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000498 · Cited by 170
Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5 · Cited by 153
Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.006 · Cited by 146
Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning
Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193584 · Cited by 145
The correction of errors committed with high confidence
Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2006) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6894-z · Cited by 159
Self-citationPrinciples of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194056 · Cited by 139
Self-citationDissociable effects of surprising rewards on learning and memory.
Rouhani, N., Norman, K. A., & Niv, Y. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000518 · Cited by 142
Surprising feedback improves later memory
Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.88 · Cited by 124
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning In and Across the Disciplines
McKinney, K. G., & Huber, M. T. (2012) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 117
Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task
Butterfield, B., & Mangels, J. A. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00203-9 · Cited by 120
Self-citationThe role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database.
Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2017) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000087 · Cited by 105
How Retrieval Attempts Affect Learning
Kornell, N., & Vaughn, K. E. (2016) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2016.03.003 · Cited by 104
The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability.
Swire‐Thompson, B., Miklaucic, N., Wihbey, J., Lazer, D. M. J., & Degutis, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001131 · Cited by 95
General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms
Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J. T., Rawson, K. A., Rhodes, M. G., & Sitzman, D. M. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0307-9 · Cited by 95
The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return
Butler, A. C., Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0173-y · Cited by 89
The Role of Repeated Retrieval in Shaping Collective Memory
Roediger, H. L., III, Zaromb, F. M., & Butler, A. C. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626999.009 · Cited by 89
Kornell, N. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0033699 · Cited by 88
Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610371341 · Cited by 87
Epistemic curiosity and the region of proximal learning
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Eich, T. S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.007 · Cited by 101
Self-citationProviding different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning
Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y · Cited by 93
Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.7.951 · Cited by 102
Self-citationRefutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence
van Loon, M. H., Dunlosky, J. T., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.003 · Cited by 84
People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: Did they know it all along?
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0021962 · Cited by 88
Self-citationReward Prediction Error and Declarative Memory
Ergo, K., Loof, E. D., & Verguts, T. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.009 · Cited by 66
Rinne, L. F., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098663 · Cited by 69
Learning from errors: Students' and instructors' practices, attitudes, and beliefs
Pan, S. C., Sana, F., Samani, J., Cooke, J., & Kim, J. A. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1815790 · Cited by 65
Does incorrect guessing impair fact learning?
Kang, S. H. K., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Mozer, M. C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021977 · Cited by 67
Receiving right/wrong feedback: Consequences for learning
Fazio, L. K., Huelser, B. J., Johnson, A., & Marsh, E. J. (2010) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211003652491 · Cited by 66
Improving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education
Yeh, D. D., & Park, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.012 · Cited by 66
Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in children
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.004 · Cited by 63
Self-citationWhat causes the insight memory advantage?
Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104411 · Cited by 63
Response-based outcome predictions and confidence regulate feedback processing and learning
Frömer, R., Nassar, M. R., Bruckner, R., Stürmer, B., Sommer, W., & Yeung, N. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62825 · Cited by 67
Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B. A., Nash, B. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948 · Cited by 67
Pan, S. C., & Carpenter, S. K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09814-5 · Cited by 60
Mera, Y., Rodríguez, G., & Marin-Garcia, E. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02022-8 · Cited by 74
Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.
Rich, P. R., van Loon, M. H., Dunlosky, J. T., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000322 · Cited by 55
Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M. L., & Seli, P. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01767-y · Cited by 60
Predicting as a learning strategy
Brod, G. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01904-1 · Cited by 52
“In their original experiment, Butterfield and Metcalfe (2001) asked students to predict answers to trivia questions, followed by confidence ratings and presentation of the correct answer.”
BackgroundVerstege, S., Pijeira‐Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Diederen, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.020 · Cited by 56
Mistakes on display: Incorrect examples refine equation solving and algebraic feature knowledge
Barbieri, C., & Booth, J. L. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3663 · Cited by 50
Signed Reward Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum Drive Episodic Memory
Calderon, C. B., Loof, E. D., Ergo, K., Snoeck, A., Boehler, C. N., & Verguts, T. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1785-20.2020 · Cited by 49
Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test
Marsh, E. J., Lozito, J. P., Umanath, S., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2012) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.684882 · Cited by 46
Mullaney, K. M., Carpenter, S. K., Grotenhuis, C., & Burianek, S. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0441-y · Cited by 47
Positive and Negative Effects of Monitoring Popular Films for Historical Inaccuracies
Umanath, S., Butler, A. C., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2827 · Cited by 43
Neural Correlates of People's Hypercorrection of Their False Beliefs
Metcalfe, J., Butterfield, B., Habeck, C. G., & Stern, Y. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00228 · Cited by 47
Self-citationThe dark side of testing memory: Repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility.
Chan, J. C. K., & LaPaglia, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0025147 · Cited by 41
Toward consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning
Butler, A. C., & Woodward, N. R. (2018) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001 · Cited by 43
Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children
Marsh, E. J., Fazio, L. K., & Goswick, A. E. (2012) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.708757 · Cited by 38
Developing an assessment of epistemic trust: a research protocol
Schröder‐Pfeifer, P., Talia, A., Volkert, J., & Taubner, S. (2018) · Research in Psychotherapy Psychopathology Process and Outcome · doi:10.4081/ripppo.2018.330 · Cited by 40
Gordon, K. R. (2020) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2020_lshss-19i-00001 · Cited by 45
Curiosity: The effects of feedback and confidence on the desire to know.
Metcalfe, J., Vuorre, M., Towner, E., & Eich, T. S. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001284 · Cited by 38
Self-citationThe role of prior knowledge in error correction for younger and older adults
Sitzman, D. M., Rhodes, M. G., Tauber, S. K., & Liceralde, V. R. T. (2015) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2014.993302 · Cited by 37
Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview
LaPaglia, J. A., Wilford, M. M., Rivard, J. R., Chan, J. C. K., & Fisher, R. P. (2013) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2950 · Cited by 37
Metcalfe, J., & Miele, D. B. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.001 · Cited by 38
Self-citationLearning from errors is attributable to episodic recollection rather than semantic mediation
Metcalfe, J., & Huelser, B. J. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107296 · Cited by 38
Self-citationWilliams, D. M., Bergström, Z. M., & Grainger, C. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361316680178 · Cited by 38
The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators.
Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000258 · Cited by 38
Breitwieser, J., & Brod, G. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13393 · Cited by 35
Vuorre, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2021) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-020-09257-1 · Cited by 38
Self-citationNarciss, S., & Alemdağ, E. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12716 · Cited by 33
Believing that Humans Swallow Spiders in Their Sleep
Marsh, E. J., Cantor, A. D., & Brashier, N. M. (2015) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2015.09.003 · Cited by 36
Two routes to memory benefits of guessing.
Zawadzka, K., & Hanczakowski, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000676 · Cited by 35
Ackerman, R., Parush, A., Nassar, F., & Shtub, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.041 · Cited by 33
Self-Regulated Learning in Undergraduate Science
Higgins, N., Frankland, S., & Rathner, J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30722/ijisme.29.01.005 · Cited by 44
Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence
Sitzman, D. M., Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0344-3 · Cited by 33
The Value of Standardized Testing
Benjamin, A. S., & Pashler, H. (2015) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215601116 · Cited by 37
Morris, M. W., Savani, K., & Fincher, K. M. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000149 · Cited by 35
Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
Thomas, R. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028886 · Cited by 28
Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning
Han, S., & Dobbins, I. G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.3.469 · Cited by 28
Kim, Y., Zepeda, C. D., & Butler, A. C. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09800-x · Cited by 39
Facilitating transfer through incorrect examples and explanatory feedback
Corral, D., & Carpenter, S. K. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820909454 · Cited by 26
On Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks
Metcalfe, J., Casal-Roscum, L., Radin, A. S., & Friedman, D. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615597912 · Cited by 28
Self-citationThe effect of unsuccessful retrieval on children’s subsequent learning
Carneiro, P., Lapa, A., & Finn, B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.010 · Cited by 25
Tip-of-the-tongue states predict enhanced feedback processing and subsequent memory.
Bloom, P., Friedman, D., Xu, J., Vuorre, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.010 · Cited by 20
Self-citationEfklides, A. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.001 · Cited by 26
Knowing-it-all but still learning: Perceptions of one’s own knowledge and belief revision.
Hagá, S., & Olson, K. R. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000433 · Cited by 29
Aha! moments correspond to metacognitive prediction errors
Dubey, R., Ho, M. K., Mehta, H., & Griffiths, T. L. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106537 · Cited by 30
Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: Is successful retrieval required?
Finn, B., Roediger, H. L., III, & Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0203-7 · Cited by 25
Carpenter, S. K., & Vul, E. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0092-1 · Cited by 26
Eye Tracking the Feedback Assigned to Undergraduate Students in a Digital Assessment Game
Cutumisu, M., Turgeon, K.-L., Saiyera, T., Chuong, S., Esparza, L. M. G., MacDonald, R., & Kokhan, V. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01931 · Cited by 23
Curiosity and the desire for agency: wait, wait … don’t tell me!
Metcalfe, J., Kennedy-Pyers, T., & Vuorre, M. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00330-0 · Cited by 25
Self-citationRindal, E. J., DeFranco, R., Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000265 · Cited by 23
The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults
Eich, T. S., Stern, Y., & Metcalfe, J. (2012) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2012.754399 · Cited by 22
Self-citation[Substernal goiters. 218 operated cases].
Cougard, P., Matet, P., Goudet, P., Bambili, R., Viard, H., Vaillant, G., Vergès, B. L., & Brun, J. M. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 21
Learning from your mistakes: does it matter if you’re out in left foot, I mean field?
Cyr, A.-A., & Anderson, N. D. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1464189 · Cited by 20
Selective effects of errorful generation on recognition memory: the role of motivation and surprise
Seabrooke, T., Mitchell, C. J., Wills, A. J., Waters, J. L., & Hollins, T. J. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1647247 · Cited by 21
Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections?
Ithisuphalap, J., Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1752731 · Cited by 20
Learning from errors versus explicit instruction in preparation for a test that counts
Metcalfe, J., Xu, J., Vuorre, M., Siegler, R. S., Wiliam, D., & Bjork, R. A. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12651 · Cited by 31
Self-citationUnderstanding Test Takers' Choices in a Self-Adapted Test: A Hidden Markov Modeling of Process Data
Arieli‐Attali, M., Ou, L., & Simmering, V. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00083 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Metcalfe, Janet
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1491-1494
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2003949574
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH8066)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- metacognition, memory confidence, memory errors, error correction, metacognitive confidence, retrieval interference, associative strength, metacognitive accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Learning, Male, Memory, Self-Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review