Cited by 147Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring

Donnenwerth-Nolan, Suzanne, Tanenhaus, Michael K., Seidenberg, Mark S.·1981·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

Abstract

Seidenberg and Tanenhaus reported that orthographically similar rhymes were detected more rapidly than dissimilar rhymes in a rhyme monitoring task with auditory stimulus presentation. The present experiments investigated the hypothesis that these results were due to a rhyme production-frequency bias in favor of similar rhymes that was present in their materials. In three experiments, subjects monitored short word lists for the word that rhymed with a cue presented prior to each list. All stimuli were presented auditorily. Cue-target rhyme production frequency was equated for orthographically similar and dissimilar rhymes. Similar rhymes were detected more rapidly in all three experiments, indicating that orthographic information was accessed in auditory word recognition. The results suggest that multiple codes are automatically accessed in word recognition. This entails a reinterpretation of phonological "recording" in visual word recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.170

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A dramatic interference of orthography on speech perception has been evidenced in a variety of behavioral tasks including rhyme detection, syllable monitoring, lexical decision, and phoneme monitoring.

    “Furthemore, a dramatic interference of orthography on speech perception has been evidenced in a variety of behavioral tasks including rhyme detection (Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981), syllable monitoring (Taft and Hambly, 1985), lexical decision (Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998), and phoneme monitoring.”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Published
1981
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
170-180
ISSN
0096-1515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007495978
Cited by
147
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
word recognition, orthographic similarity, auditory word recognition, visual word recognition
MeSH terms
Cues, Humans, Phonetics, Reaction Time, Semantics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review