The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring
Abstract
Seidenberg and Tanenhaus reported that orthographically similar rhymes were detected more rapidly than dissimilar rhymes in a rhyme monitoring task with auditory stimulus presentation. The present experiments investigated the hypothesis that these results were due to a rhyme production-frequency bias in favor of similar rhymes that was present in their materials. In three experiments, subjects monitored short word lists for the word that rhymed with a cue presented prior to each list. All stimuli were presented auditorily. Cue-target rhyme production frequency was equated for orthographically similar and dissimilar rhymes. Similar rhymes were detected more rapidly in all three experiments, indicating that orthographic information was accessed in auditory word recognition. The results suggest that multiple codes are automatically accessed in word recognition. This entails a reinterpretation of phonological "recording" in visual word recognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthemore, a dramatic interference of orthography on speech perception has been evidenced in a variety of behavioral tasks including rhyme detection (Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981), syllable monitoring (Taft and Hambly, 1985), lexical decision (Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998), and phoneme monitoring.”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Retrieval time from semantic memory
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80069-1 · Cited by 3,265
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031564 · Cited by 2,974
Neely, J. H. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226 · Cited by 2,826
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Clark, H. H. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80014-3 · Cited by 2,265
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Knowing when, where, and how to remember ; A problem of metacognition
Brown, A. L. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,469
Hilgard, E. R. (1948) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · doi:10.1037/10757-000 · Cited by 1,335
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
Self-citationMahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004 · Cited by 1,461
Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?
Castles, A. E., & Coltheart, M. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00164-1 · Cited by 1,064
Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518 · Cited by 947
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049 · Cited by 776
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
- Published
- 1981
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 170-180
- ISSN
- 0096-1515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007495978
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- word recognition, orthographic similarity, auditory word recognition, visual word recognition
- MeSH terms
- Cues, Humans, Phonetics, Reaction Time, Semantics, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
