The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults.
Abstract
The efficacy of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screener for clinical depression was examined in a sample of 1,005 community-residing adults (age range = 50-96). Presence of a depressive disorder was determined by diagnostic interview. Analyses revealed that neither age, gender, cognitive impairment, functional impairment, physical disease, nor social desirability had a significant negative effect on the psychometric properties or screening efficacy of the CES-D. These results indicate that there was no significant degradation in the ability of the CES-D to screen for depression among community-residing elderly adults. This conclusion must be tempered by the fact that the sample did not include participants with the more disabling forms of cognitive or functional impairment and physical illness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We used the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale to evaluate depression,38 and we defined scores higher than 22 as indicating depression symptomatology (α = 0.87; mean = 22.22; SD = 10.36), consistent with previous research.9,39–42”
From Sexual Compulsivity, Co-Occurring Psychosocial Health Problems, and HIV Risk Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Further Evidence of a Syndemic (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,842
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Screening for Depression in the Older Adult
Irwin, M. R., Artin, K. H., & Oxman, M. N. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.15.1701 · Cited by 1,220
Vilagut, G., Forero, C. G., Barbaglia, G., & Alonso, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155431 · Cited by 1,053
Howard-Anderson, J., Ganz, P. A., Bower, J. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2012) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr541 · Cited by 830
McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A. H., & Bowman, P. J. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201274008 · Cited by 822
Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1 · Cited by 777
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2093505519
- Cited by
- 1,782
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 162 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh035672-05)
- National Institute on Aging (AG1449)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH33572, MH 35672)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, depression screening, community-dwelling older adults, psychometric properties, screening efficacy, cognitive impairment, functional disability, physical illness, social desirability, age and gender effects
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Community Mental Health Services, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
