Cited by 488Health disparities and outcomesCardiac Health and Mental HealthAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressure.

Abstract

A population-based sample of Caucasians, African Americans, and Latino Americans, 50-68 years of age (M = 57.5), from Cook County, Illinois (N = 229), was tested to examine how loneliness and co-occurring psychosocial factors (depressive symptoms, perceived stress, social support, and hostility) were related to indices of cardiovascular and endocrine functioning. Extending prior research, the authors found that loneliness was associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and age-related increases in SBP, net of demographic variables, health behavior variables, and the remaining psychosocial factors. Loneliness was not associated with differences in autonomic or endocrine functioning. Although the results are limited by the cross-sectional methods used, they are consistent with the hypothesis that cardiovascular disease contributes to increased morbidity and mortality among lonely individuals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.152

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Peplau, 1979, The experience of loneliness., 53
  2. Rubenstein, 1982, In search of intimacy.
  3. 10.1210/jc.82.8.2458 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–487 of 487

Metadata

Authors
Hawkley, L. C., Masi, C. M., Berry, J. D., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2006-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
152-164
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2122524132
Cited by
488
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Aging (PO1 AG18911)
  • Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
loneliness, systolic blood pressure, age-related blood pressure increase, cardiovascular risk, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, social support, hostility, autonomic function, endocrine function, psychosocial factors, older adults, racial and ethnic differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Blood Pressure, Catecholamines, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Creatinine, Demography, Depression, Electrocardiography, Female, Hostility, Humans, Hypertension, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review