Cited by 221Technology Use by Older AdultsAging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Age differences in the performance of computer-based work

Czaja, Sara J., Sharit, Joseph·1993·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which age had an impact on the performance of computer-based work. Three simulated real-world computer-interactive tasks that varied in complexity and pacing requirements were evaluated. Ss included 65 women, ranging in age from 25 years to 70 years. The methodology encompassed physiological, subjective, and objective performance measures. The data indicated that previous computer experience and age had a significant impact on the performance of the 3 tasks. Increased age was associated with longer response times and a greater number of errors for all 3 tasks. Age also influenced perceptions of fatigue and task difficulty. The findings are discussed in terms of the implications for training and job design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.59

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to young people, the performance of the elderly is especially impaired when the complexity of the task is raised.

    “In diverse experimental settings and problem domains a so-called complexity effect has been demonstrated, indicating that relative to the young, the performance of the elderly is especially impaired when the complexity of the task is raised (Czaja & Sharit, 1993;Gilinsky & Judd, 1994;Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Czaja & Sharit, 1993

  • Performance was especially poorer in the more complex far-transfer domain, which is a confirmation of earlier research findings (Czaja & Sharit, 1993; Gilinsky & Judd, 1994; Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).

    “Performance was especially poorer in the more complex far-transfer domain, which is a confirmation of earlier research findings (Czaja & Sharit, 1993;Gilinsky & Judd, 1994;Lorsbach & Simpson, 1988).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Czaja & Sharit, 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1993
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
59-67
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W1970057338
Cited by
221
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
26.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag006794-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG06794-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
age differences, computer work, older women, computer experience, reaction time (psychology), task errors, subjective fatigue, task difficulty, job design
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Attitude to Computers, Computer Literacy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Software, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review