The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions.
Open accessAbstract
It is widely accepted that patients with frontal lesions have problems inhibiting automatic response tendencies. Whereas inhibition deficits of overlearned responses have been extensively investigated using interference tasks like the Stroop task (J. R. Stroop, 1935), it is controversial whether patients with frontal brain lesions also have problems inhibiting imitative responses. Using an interference paradigm, the present study investigated imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal lesions. In addition, it tested whether patients deficient in the inhibition of imitative responses correspondingly have problems inhibiting overlearned responses. It was found that the group with frontal lesions displayed significantly stronger imitative response tendencies than the group with nonfrontal lesions. Furthermore, it was shown that the inhibition of imitative responses is functionally unrelated to Stroop interference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More specifically, imitative tendencies have to be inhibited to prevent overt imitation (Brass, Derrfuss, Cramon, Matthes-von Cramon, & von Cramon, 2003;De Renzi, Cavalleri, & Facchini, 1996;Lhermitte, Pillon, & Serdaru, 1986).”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Brass, Derrfuss, Cramon, Matthes-von Cramon, & von Cramon, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Supporting evidence comes from a neuropsychological study showing that patients with frontal lesions exhibit problems inhibiting imitative response tendencies (Brass et al., 2003).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Brass et al., 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Action recognition in the premotor cortex
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.593 · Cited by 4,968
The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 · Cited by 3,674
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090060 · Cited by 3,302
Higher cortical functions in man
Lurii︠a︡, A. R., Teuber, H., Pribram, K. H., & Haigh, B. (1966) · Basic Books · Cited by 2,858
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683
A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects
Nelson, H. E. (1976) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(76)80035-4 · Cited by 2,454
Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608 · Cited by 2,297
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059831 · Cited by 2,244
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Beringer, 1995, Experimental Run Time System
- Horn, 1983, Leistungprufsystem (LPS)
- Lehrl, 1999, Mehrfach-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest (MWT-B)
- Nelson, 1991, National Adult Reading Test manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 · Cited by 846
Hurley, S. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07003123 · Cited by 512
Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?
Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007 · Cited by 580
Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition
Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0066 · Cited by 347
The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.018 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., Matthes-von Cramon, G., & von Cramon, D. Y.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-271
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2143454976
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- response inhibition, Stroop interference, interference task, frontal lobe dysfunction, automated response
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Injuries, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
