Cited by 387Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition

Open access
Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Binns, M. A., Gillingham, S.·2006·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

This study examined the performance of 38 normal subjects and 43 patients with focal lesions of the frontal lobes on a simple go-nogo task where the probability of the nogo stimulus was either 75% or 25%. Patients with lesions to the superior medial parts of the frontal lobes, in particular to the left superior portion of Brodmann area 6 (which includes the supplementary motor areas and the premotor areas for the right hand) had an increased number of false alarms (incorrect responses to the nogo stimulus). These results indicate that area 6 is specifically involved in the inhibition of response. Patients with lesions to the right anterior cingulate (areas 24 and 32) were slower and more variable in their reaction time. These findings could be explained by an inability to sustain stimulus-response contingencies. Lesions to the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 44, 45, 47) also increased the variability of response, perhaps by disrupting monitoring performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhk031

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the three largest human frontal lesion studies of response inhibition to date, poor inhibitory performance was associated with lesions of the superior medial frontal lobe.

    “In the three largest human frontal lesion studies of response inhibition to date, poor inhibitory performance was associated with lesions of the superior medial frontal lobe (Drewe et al, 1975; Floden & Stuss, 2006; Picton et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Binns, M. A., & Gillingham, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2006-05-17
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
826-838
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2132709875
Cited by
387
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 27
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
response inhibition, go/no-go task, frontal lobe lesions, Brodmann area 6, supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, false alarm rate, reaction time variability
MeSH terms
Brain Damage, Chronic, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Neural Inhibition, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review