Cited by 658Historical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: imitation and utilization behavior: a neuropsychological study of 75 patients

Lhermitte, F., Pillon, B., Serdaru, M.·1986·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

A type of pathological behavior, imitation behavior (IB), is newly described. In this behavior patients imitate the examiner's gestures, although not instructed to do so. Patients explain that they thought they had to imitate the examiner. IB is the first stage of utilization behavior (UB). Neuropsychological examination of 40 patients with IB, of 35 with UB, and of 50 disease controls demonstrates the existence of a frontal syndrome and two determining features of such behavior: dependence on (1) the social and (2) the physical environments. Loss of intellectual control was also required for the occurrence of such behavior. UB and/or IB were present in 96% of the 29 patients with focal lesions of the frontal lobes. Computed tomographic scans in 26 of these patients showed involvement of the inferior half of the anterior part of one or both frontal lobes. IB and UB are interpreted as release of parietal lobe activities, resulting from impairment of frontal lobe inhibition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410190404

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with brain damage who imitate uncontrollably imply that an active inhibitory mechanism normally controls automatic imitation.

    “and the existence of patients who imitate uncontrollably after brain damage (Lhermitte et al., 1986; De Renzi et al., 1996) suggests that some active inhibitory mechanism is required to control automatic imitation.”
  • Imitative tendencies must be inhibited to prevent overt imitation.

    “More specifically, imitative tendencies have to be inhibited to prevent overt imitation (Brass, Derrfuss, Cramon, Matthes-von Cramon, & von Cramon, 2003;De Renzi, Cavalleri, & Facchini, 1996;Lhermitte, Pillon, & Serdaru, 1986).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Lhermitte, Pillon, & Serdaru, 1986

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lhermitte, F., Pillon, B., & Serdaru, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Lhermitte, F.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
326-334
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2126262915
Cited by
658
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
12.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
imitation, utilization behavior, frontal lobe lesions, frontal syndrome, human autonomy, intellectual control, social dependence, frontal lobe dysfunction
MeSH terms
Behavior, Brain Diseases, Cues, Environment, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychology, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review