The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET.
Abstract
The Origins of O*NET The O*NET Content Model Research Method Development and Field Testing of the Content Model Basic and Cross-Functional Skills Knowledges Occupational Preparation - Education, Training, Experience and Licensure/Certification Generalized Work Activities Work Context Organizational Context Abilities Occupational Interests and Values Work Styles Occupation-Specific Descriptors - Approaches, Procedures and Findings Occupational Descriptor Covariates - Potential Sources of Variance in O*NET Ratings Cross-Domain Analyses Occupation Classification - Using Basic and Cross-Functional Skills and Generalized Work Activities to Create Job Families Database Design and Development - Designing an Electronic Infrastructure Summary of Results and Implications for O*NET Applications and Future Directions O*NET's Theoretical Contributions to Job Analysis Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410409534549 · Cited by 1,132
Leadership skills for a changing world
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00041-7 · Cited by 888
Self-citationSajjadiani, S., Sojourner, A. J., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Mykerezi, E. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000405 · Cited by 173
Procrastination's Impact in the Workplace and the Workplace's Impact on Procrastination
Nguyen, B., Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. R. (2013) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12048 · Cited by 167
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.602 · Cited by 145
Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.
Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1 · Cited by 136
Occupational cognitive requirements and late-life cognitive aging
Pool, L. R., Weuve, J., Wilson, R. S., Bültmann, U., Evans, D. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002569 · Cited by 128
The Strong Ring: A Basic Interest Model of Occupational Structure.
Armstrong, P. I., Smith, T. J., Donnay, D. A. C., & Rounds, J. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.299 · Cited by 46
Military enlistment selection and classification: Moving forward
Rumsey, M. G., & Arabian, J. M. (2014) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1037/mil0000040 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W1951753142
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.