The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: Development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample.
Abstract
The authors developed the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) and evaluated its psychometric properties. The SITBI is a structured interview that assesses the presence, frequency, and characteristics of a wide range of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, including suicidal ideation, suicide plans, suicide gestures, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). This initial study, based on the administration of the SITBI to 94 adolescents and young adults, suggested that the SITBI has strong interrater reliability (average kappa = .99, r = 1.0) and test-retest reliability (average kappa = .70, intraclass correlation coefficient = .44) over a 6-month period. Moreover, concurrent validity was demonstrated via strong correspondence between the SITBI and other measures of suicidal ideation (average kappa = .54), suicide attempt (kappa = .65), and NSSI (average kappa = .87). The authors concluded that the SITBI uniformly and comprehensively assesses a wide range of self-injury-related constructs and provides a new instrument that can be administered with relative ease in both research and clinical settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SITBI has demonstrated good reliability and convergent validity in prior studies (Nock et al. 2007).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Nock et al. 2007
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,842
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Kessler, R. C. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002 · Cited by 12,370
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
KAUFMAN, J., BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D., RAO, U., FLYNN, C., MORECI, P., WILLIAMSON, D., & RYAN, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · Cited by 10,148
De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483 · Cited by 2,548
Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Lifetime Suicide Attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey
Kessler, R. C., Borges, G., & Walters, E. E. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.617 · Cited by 2,514
Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: Diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts
NOCK, M., JOINERJR, T., GORDON, K., LLOYDRICHARDSON, E., & PRINSTEIN, M. (2006) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2006.05.010 · Cited by 1,617
Self-citationA Functional Approach to the Assessment of Self-Mutilative Behavior.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.885 · Cited by 1,564
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–112 of 112
Implicit Cognitions as a Behavioral Marker of Suicide Attempts in Adolescents
Millner, A. J., Augenstein, T. M., Visser, K. H., Gallagher, K., Vergara, G. A., D’Angelo, E. J., & Nock, M. K. (2019) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2017.1421488 · Cited by 29
Self-citationKaryotaki, E., Klein, A. M., Riper, H., Wit, L. D., Krijnen, L., Bol, E., Bolinski, F., Burger, S., Ebert, D. D., Auerbach, R. P., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028739 · Cited by 28
Galatzer-Levy, I., Abbas, A., Ries, A., Homan, S., Sels, L., Koesmahargyo, V., Yadav, V., Colla, M., Scheerer, H., Vetter, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25199 · Cited by 23
Rapid intensification of suicide risk preceding suicidal behavior among primary care patients
Bryan, C. J., Allen, M. H., Wastler, H. M., Bryan, A. O., Baker, J. C., May, A. M., & Thomsen, C. J. (2023) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12948 · Cited by 23
Digital media-related precursors to psychiatric hospitalization among youth.
Nesi, J., Burke, T. A., Caltabiano, A., Spirito, A., & Wolff, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.013 · Cited by 21
Taliaferro, L. A., Almeida, J., Aguinaldo, L. D., & McManama O’Brien, K. H. (2019) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104519862340 · Cited by 21
Victor, S. E., Brown, S. L., & Scott, L. N. (2021) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2021.01.003 · Cited by 20
Yang, L., Zhang, S., Liu, X., Hou, J., & Hou, X. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01666-y · Cited by 14
Tavakoli, P., Jerome, E., Boafo, A., & Campbell, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.694147 · Cited by 12
Nuij, C., Van Ballegooijen, W., Smit, A. C., De Beurs, D., De Winter, R. F. P., O’Connor, R. C., Kerkhof, A., Smit, J. H., & Riper, H. (2023) · Journal for Person-Oriented Research · doi:10.17505/jpor.2023.25265 · Cited by 6
Cwik, J. C., Forkmann, T., Glaesmer, H., Paashaus, L., Schönfelder, A., Rath, D., Prinz, S., Juckel, G., & Teismann, T. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02812-9 · Cited by 5
Christiansen, E., Konieczna, A., Larsen, C. P., Jakobsen, S. G., & O´Connor, R. C. (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08049-2 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nock, M. K., Holmberg, E. B., Photos, V. I., & Michel, B. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Nock, Matthew K.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-317
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2003066807
- Cited by
- 1,352
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- self-injurious thoughts, self-harm, non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, adolescents, young adults, structured interviews, psychometric properties, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results, Self-Injurious Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
