Cited by 29Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via WritingDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Implicit Cognitions as a Behavioral Marker of Suicide Attempts in Adolescents

Millner, Alexander J., Augenstein, Tara M., Visser, Katherine H., Gallagher, Katie, Vergara, Genesis A., D’Angelo, Eugene J., Nock, Matthew K.·2019·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

Using self-harm Implicit Association Tests (IATs), we sought to test whether (1) suicidal adolescents show implicit identification with self-harm and whether (2) IATs are reliable and sensitive to psychiatric change and (3) predict future suicide attempts. We administered 6 self-harm IATs to 71 adolescents from a psychiatric inpatient unit and assessed suicidal behaviors at admission, discharge and 3 months after discharge. Results were in the expected direction for each IAT but not statistically significant. After aggregating trials across IATs, suicide attempters showed increased implicit identification with self-harm, compared with non-suicidal controls. IATs showed good reliability and sensitivity to psychiatric change but did not prospectively predict suicide attempts. Adolescent suicide attempters may have stronger implicit associations with self-harm than non-suicidal controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2017.1421488

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The death/suicide IAT has predicted suicidal behavior in some prospective studies but not in others.

    “The IAT predicts suicidal behavior in some prospective studies (269, 270), but not others (271).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [270]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millner, A. J., Augenstein, T. M., Visser, K. H., Gallagher, K., Vergara, G. A., D’Angelo, E. J., & Nock, M. K.
Corresponding author
Millner, Alexander J.
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
47-63
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W2792585435
Cited by
29
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Military Suicide Research Consortium
  • Tommy Fuss Fund
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • MacArthur Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • US Army
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
suicide attempts, adolescents, implicit associations, self-harm, Implicit Association Test, behavioral markers, suicide risk prediction, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Techniques, Suicide, Attempted, Reproducibility of Results, Self-Injurious Behavior, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review