The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
Abstract
Two experiments investigated how the type and timing of feedback influence learning from a multiple-choice test. First, participants read 12 prose passages, which covered various general knowledge topics (e.g., The Sun) and ranged between 280 and 300 words in length. Next, they took an initial six-alternative, multiple-choice test on information contained in the passages. Feedback was given immediately for some of the multiple-choice items or after delay for other items. Participants were either shown the correct answer as feedback (standard feedback) or were allowed to keep answering until the correct answer was discovered (answer-until-correct feedback). Learning from the test was assessed on a delayed cued-recall test. The results indicated that delayed feedback led to superior final test performance relative to immediate feedback. However, type of feedback did not matter: discovering the correct answer through answer-until-correct feedback produced equivalent performance relative to standard feedback. This research suggests that delaying the presentation of feedback after a test is beneficial to learning because of the spaced presentation of information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent research shows that, at least in some cases, delayed feedback produces superior retention relative to immediate feedback.27,31”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
Self-citationThe power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
Self-citationThe generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592 · Cited by 1,659
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582 · cited 4×
“Presumably, the benefit of delayed feedback after a correct response is a type of spacing effect (Dempster, 1989; Schmidt & Bjork, 1992 ): after a correct response, delayed feedback represents a spaced presentation of the material, whereas immediate feedback constitutes a massed presentation.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313
The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching.
Skinner, B. F. (2007) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · doi:10.1037/11324-010 · Cited by 1,137
On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand
James, H. E. O., & Bruner, J. S. (1963) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119384 · Cited by 756
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
Self-citationThe effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066
Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review
van Gaalen, A. E. J., Brouwer, J., Schönrock-Adema, J., Bouwkamp-Timmer, T., Jaarsma, A. D. C., & Georgiadis, J. R. (2021) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3 · Cited by 625
Test-enhanced learning in medical education
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x · Cited by 610
Self-citationRethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing
Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316689306 · Cited by 544
Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.3.604 · Cited by 457
Self-citationTen Benefits of Testing and Their Applications to Educational Practice
Roediger, H. L., III, Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00001-6 · Cited by 496
Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests
Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2007) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1391 · Cited by 368
Self-citationCorrecting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 · Cited by 361
Self-citationTransfer of test- enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000151 · Cited by 286
Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365 · Cited by 261
(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53003-2 · Cited by 255
Online Mathematics Homework Increases Student Achievement
Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R. F., & Mason, C. A. (2016) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858416673968 · Cited by 228
Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress
Karpicke, J. D. (2017) · Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9 · Cited by 223
Self-citationNassaji, H. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816644940 · Cited by 239
Timing matters when correcting fake news
Brashier, N. M., Pennycook, G., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2020043118 · Cited by 216
Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031026 · Cited by 192
Self-citationKeep it Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect
Sundararajan, N., & Adesope, O. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09522-4 · Cited by 194
The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0016496 · Cited by 302
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2016) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658316675195 · Cited by 169
Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning
Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.8.1077 · Cited by 149
Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.116 · Cited by 137
Self-citationFeedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge.
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle‐Johnson, B. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000053 · Cited by 155
Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity
Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L., III (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579 · Cited by 149
Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay–retention effect.
Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0017407 · Cited by 127
Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012 · Cited by 119
The Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12479 · Cited by 119
Lechermeier, J., & Faßnacht, M. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0136-8 · Cited by 115
Multiple-choice testing in education: Are the best practices for assessment also good for learning?
Butler, A. C. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.002 · Cited by 142
Self-citationTest-enhanced learning in health professions education: A systematic review: BEME Guide No. 48
Green, M. L., Moeller, J. J., & Spak, J. M. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1430354 · Cited by 107
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9203-1 · Cited by 112
Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals
Patterson, J. T., & Carter, M. (2010) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2009.12.003 · Cited by 102
Rivers, M. L. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2 · Cited by 114
Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing
Wiklund‐Hörnqvist, C., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L. H. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12093 · Cited by 114
Design principles for learning analytics information systems in higher education
Nguyen, A., Tuunanen, T., Gardner, L. A., & Sheridan, D. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1816144 · Cited by 122
Mullet, H. G., Butler, A. C., Verdin, B., von Borries, R. F., & Marsh, E. J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.001 · Cited by 90
Self-citationScaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.7.951 · Cited by 102
Using Testing as a Learning Tool
Yang, B. W., Razo, J. F., & Persky, A. M. (2019) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7324 · Cited by 98
THE EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON L2 DEVELOPMENT
Fu, M., & Li, S. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000388 · Cited by 103
Retrieval Practice in Classroom Settings: A Review of Applied Research
Moreira, B. F. T., Pinto, T. S. S., Starling, D. S. V., & Jaeger, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00005 · Cited by 103
Sotola, L. K., & Credé, M. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09563-9 · Cited by 92
Henderson, C. S. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168819832907 · Cited by 76
Weighing Up Exercises on Phrasal Verbs: Retrieval Versus Trial‐and‐Error Practices
Strong, B., & Boers, F. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12579 · Cited by 73
The influences of a two-tier test strategy on student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach
Yang, T., Chen, S. Y., & Hwang, G. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.021 · Cited by 68
Improving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education
Yeh, D. D., & Park, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.012 · Cited by 66
Yang, X., Lin, L., Cheng, P.-Y., Xue, Y., & Ren, Y. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.002 · Cited by 64
Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom.
Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.002 · Cited by 75
Distractors in Parsons Problems Decrease Learning Efficiency for Young Novice Programmers
Harms, K. J., Chen, J., & Kelleher, C. L. (2016) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/2960310.2960314 · Cited by 63
Chan, J. C. K., & Langley, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0021204 · Cited by 64
The testing effect: The role of feedback and collaboration in a tertiary classroom setting
Vojdanoska, M., Cranney, J., & Newell, B. R. (2009) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1630 · Cited by 58
A Controlled Study of Clicker-Assisted Memory Enhancement in College Classrooms
Shapiro, A., & Gordon, L. T. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2843 · Cited by 60
Nakata, T. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168814541721 · Cited by 64
Multiple-choice questions: Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online.
Xu, X., Kauer, S. D., & Tupy, S. (2016) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000062 · Cited by 59
Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.
Rich, P. R., van Loon, M. H., Dunlosky, J. T., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000322 · Cited by 55
Bould, M. D., Naik, V. N., & Hamstra, S. J. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9633-0 · Cited by 49
Sein, A. S., Rashid, H., Meka, J., Amiel, J. M., & Pluta, W. J. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1789081 · Cited by 57
Using Fictional Sources in the Classroom: Applications from Cognitive Psychology
Marsh, E. J., Butler, A. C., & Umanath, S. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9204-0 · Cited by 53
Self-citationPrevention–Permission–Promotion: A Review of Approaches to Errors in Learning
Wong, S. S. H., & Lim, S. W. H. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1501693 · Cited by 53
How the timing of performance feedback impacts individual performance
Thornock, T. A. (2016) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2016.09.002 · Cited by 55
Investigating the testing effect: Retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies
Bae, C. L. L., Therriault, D. J., & Redifer, J. L. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008 · Cited by 54
Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test
Marsh, E. J., Lozito, J. P., Umanath, S., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2012) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.684882 · Cited by 46
Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Huber, D. E. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.638079 · Cited by 46
Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584211060804 · Cited by 63
A Learning Analytics Approach to Monitoring the Quality of Online One-to-One Tutoring
Cukurova, M., Khan-Galaria, M., Millán, E., & Luckin, R. (2022) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2022.7411 · Cited by 57
Mullaney, K. M., Carpenter, S. K., Grotenhuis, C., & Burianek, S. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0441-y · Cited by 47
Persky, A. M., Henry, T. R., & Campbell, A. (2015) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe79220 · Cited by 46
Clinical study of student learning using mastery style versus immediate feedback online activities
Gladding, G. E., Gutmann, B., Schroeder, N. L., & Stelzer, T. J. (2015) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.11.010114 · Cited by 45
Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: An effective online educational tool
Wojcikowski, K., & Kirk, L. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.826793 · Cited by 41
Systematic review of distributed practice and retrieval practice in health professions education
Trumble, E., Lodge, J. M., Mandrusiak, A., & Forbes, R. (2023) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-023-10274-3 · Cited by 70
How Effective is Example Generation for Learning Declarative Concepts?
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9377-z · Cited by 41
Toward consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning
Butler, A. C., & Woodward, N. R. (2018) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001 · Cited by 43
Self-citationTaveira-Gomes, T., Prado-Costa, R., Severo, M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0275-0 · Cited by 39
Pharmacy Student Self-Testing as a Predictor of Examination Performance
Stewart, D. W., Panus, P. C., Hagemeier, N. E., Thigpen, J. C., & Brooks, L. (2014) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe78232 · Cited by 40
Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning
Worthy, D. A., Markman, A. B., & Maddox, W. T. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.006 · Cited by 39
The benefits of computer-generated feedback for mathematics problem solving.
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.009 · Cited by 36
Storkel, H. L., Komesidou, R., Fleming, K., & Romine, R. S. (2017) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2017_lshss-16-0058 · Cited by 43
The science of teaching science
Mostafa, T., Echazarra, A., & Guillou, H. (2018) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/f5bd9e57-en · Cited by 52
Mathematics practice without feedback: A desirable difficulty in a classroom setting
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9401-1 · Cited by 37
A Systematic Review of the Testing Effect in Learning
Eisenkraemer, R. E., Jaeger, A., & Stein, L. M. (2013) · Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) · doi:10.1590/1982-43272356201314 · Cited by 44
Automated Summarization Evaluation (ASE) Using Natural Language Processing Tools
Crossley, S. A., Kim, M., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_8 · Cited by 36
Cogliano, M., Kardash, C. M., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.001 · Cited by 43
Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4 · Cited by 34
Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., & Kardash, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000624 · Cited by 46
Trial-and-error learning improves source memory among young and older adults.
Cyr, A.-A., & Anderson, N. D. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0025115 · Cited by 33
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Dotan, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1 · Cited by 32
Providing immediate feedback improves recycling and composting accuracy
Luo, Y., Zelenika, I., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.061 · Cited by 32
Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence
Sitzman, D. M., Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0344-3 · Cited by 33
Test-enhanced learning: analysis of an experience with undergraduate nursing students
Messineo, L., Gentile, M., & Allegra, M. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0464-5 · Cited by 33
Taylor, A., Sanson, M., Burnell, R., Wade, K. A., & Garry, M. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726 · Cited by 33
The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill
Muhsin, M. A. (2016) · Lingua Cultura · doi:10.21512/lc.v10i1.873 · Cited by 29
Collective firm-internal online idea development
Chen, Q., Magnusson, M. G., & Björk, J. (2019) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-02-2018-0045 · Cited by 29
The effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on complex concept learning
Corral, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Clingan-Siverly, S. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820977739 · Cited by 31
Delayed instructional feedback may be more effective, but is this contrary to learners' preferences?
Lefevre, D., & Cox, B. (2017) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12495 · Cited by 20
Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking
Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., & Roelle, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02596 · Cited by 30
Cumulative assessment: strategic choices to influence students’ study effort
Kerdijk, W., Tio, R. A., Mulder, B. F., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2013) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-172 · Cited by 27
Dood, A. J., Fields, K. B., de Arellano, D. C., & Raker, J. R. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1139/cjc-2018-0479 · Cited by 26
PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists: Design and evaluation
Kovácsová, N., Vlakveld, W. P., de Winter, J., & Hagenzieker, M. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104561 · Cited by 25
Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: Is successful retrieval required?
Finn, B., Roediger, H. L., III, & Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0203-7 · Cited by 25
Designing automated guidance for concept diagrams in inquiry instruction
Ryoo, K., & Linn, M. C. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21321 · Cited by 27
Testing together: When do students learn more through collaborative tests?
LoGiudice, A. B., Pachai, A. A., & Kim, J. A. (2015) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000041 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-281
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2122370331
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Institute of Education Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- feedback timing, delayed feedback, immediate feedback, multiple-choice tests, test-based learning, cued recall, prose reading
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review