Cited by 261Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics

Open access
Mulliner, Emma, Tucker, Matthew·2017·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

While feedback is widely considered central to student learning, students across the higher education sector commonly report dissatisfaction with the feedback they receive. In contrast, academics often feel they provide quality and informative feedback. This article explores and compares the perceptions of students and academics with regard to feedback practice. The paper presents the results of questionnaire surveys conducted with academics and students at the School of the Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University. It highlights the perceptions of academics and students with regard to preferences for different types of feedback, timeliness of feedback, students’ engagement and interest in feedback, quality feedback and satisfaction with current practice. The findings indicate a significant discord between staff and students in relation to certain aspects of feedback practice, namely opinions on students’ engagement and interest in feedback, satisfaction with current practice and feedback preference. Similarities in viewpoints were also found in relation to quality feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding students' perceptions is of particular significance, as these perceptions shape not only students' engagement with feedback but also the extent to which they interpret and act upon it, ultimately influencing their overall satisfaction with the learning process.

    “In addition, understanding students' perceptions is of particular significance, as these perceptions, as conceptualised by Nazaretsky et al. (2024), encompassing objectivity, usefulness, genuineness, and credibility of the provider, shape not only students' engagement with feedback but also the extent to which they interpret and act upon it, ultimately influencing their overall satisfaction with”

    From Supporting self-regulated learning through generative AI feedback in online higher education: the importance of student perceptions of the source of feedback (2026) · cites this paper as Mulliner & Tucker, 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [7]7. Bohnacker-Bruce, S. 2013. Effective feedback: the student perspective. Capture 4 (1): 25 -36.
  2. [28]28. Di Costa, N. 2010. Feedback on Feedback: Student and academic perceptions, expectations and practices within an undergraduate Pharmacy course. Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference, University of Technology, Sydney, November 18-19.
  3. [35]35. Gibbs, G. 1999. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In Assessment matters in higher education, edited by S. Brown, and A. Glasner, 41- 53. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  4. [44]44. Hill, K., G. Manotvani, D. Merrick. 2010. Evidence of a disparity between staff and students perception of feedback. Paper presented at the University of Nottingham's 17 th Learning and Teaching conference, Nottingham, September.
  5. [46]46. Hounsell, D. 2003. Student feedback, learning, and development. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
  6. [55]55. by M. R. Lea, and B. Stierer, 32-46. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  7. [57]57. McCann, L. and G. Saunders. 2009. Exploring Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback. Project Report. Southampton: The Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Social Policy and Social Work (SWAP).
  8. [63]63. Norton, L.S., and J.C.W. Norton. 2001. Essay feedback: how can it help students improve their academic writing? Paper presented at First International Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing across Europe (EATAW), Gronigen, June 18-20.
  9. [64]64. O'Brien, R. and L. Sparshatt. 2008. Exploring staff and students' mental maps: creating narratives for successful assessment feedback. Paper presented at the Transforming the student experience: Higher Education Academy Annual Conference 2008, Harrogate, July 1-3.
  10. [72]72. Ribchester, C., D. France, and K. Wakefield. 2008. 'It was just like a personal tutorial': Using podcasts to provide assessment feedback. Paper presented at the Higher Education Academy Conference, Harrogate, July.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mulliner, Emma
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2015-10-24
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
266-288
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W2164668300
Cited by
261
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
44.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
feedback practices, student perceptions, academic perceptions, student engagement, quality feedback, student satisfaction, feedback preferences, higher education assessment, built environment education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review