Cited by 460Work-Family Balance ChallengesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover

Hanson, Ginger C., Hammer, Leslie B., Colton, Cari L.·2006·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Abstract

Although the benefits of participating in both work and family have been recognized for more than 30 years (Sieber, 1974), limited empirical research exists. One reason for this oversight is the absence of a well-established scale to measure these benefits. We present a new multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. We conducted two studies that aided the development and validation of this scale. Our scale measures three types of work-family positive spillover: behavior-based instrumental positive spillover, value-based instrumental positive spillover, and affective positive spillover. Each of these three types of positive spillover occurs in two directions: from work to family and from family to work. We further evaluate the scale's construct validity in relation to role satisfaction and self-reported mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.249

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resources obtained in the nonwork domain, such as skills, knowledge, and social capital, can be directly moved to the other domain and can improve positive states and performance at work.

    “Spillover research posits that resources acquired in the nonwork domain (e.g., skills, knowledge, social capital) can be directly exported to the other domain, ultimately enhancing one's positive states and performance at work (Edwards and Rothbard, 2000: 186;Greenhaus and Brummelhuis, 2013;Hanson et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
2006-07
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
249-265
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
OpenAlex
W1999757736
Cited by
460
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
50.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
scale development, scale validation, role satisfaction, self-rated mental health, work-family balance, bidirectional spillover
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review