The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Service with a smile: Do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labor process?
Abstract
This survey study of 176 participants from eight customer service organizations investigated how individual factors moderate the impact of emotional labor strategies on employee well-being. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that gender and autonomy were significant moderators of the relationships between emotional labor strategies and the personal outcomes of emotional exhaustion, affective well-being, and job satisfaction. Females were more likely to experience negative consequences when engaging in surface acting. Autonomy served to alleviate negative outcomes for individuals who used emotional labor strategies often. Contrary to our hypotheses, emotional intelligence did not moderate the relationship between the emotional labor strategies and personal outcomes. Results demonstrated how the emotional labor process can influence employee well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995) · Emotion, disclosure, & health. · doi:10.1037/10182-006 · Cited by 2,375
The case for the ability‐based model of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior
Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.321 · Cited by 441
Emotional expression in cancer onset and progression
Gross, J. (1989) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(89)90342-0 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017286 · Cited by 1,722
A comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between Emotional Intelligence and health
Martins, A., Ramalho, N., & Morin, E. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.029 · Cited by 1,070
A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes
Alarcon, G. M. (2011) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007 · Cited by 845
Emotional Labor at a Crossroads: Where Do We Go from Here?
Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111400 · Cited by 664
The state of the heart: Emotional labor as emotion regulation reviewed and revised.
Grandey, A. A., & Melloy, R. C. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000067 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, H.-A. M., & Spector, P. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-333
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2016593112
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 36.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
