The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: The role of perceived organizational support.
Abstract
The present study is aimed at examining the combined effects of effort-reward imbalance (ERI), overcommitment (OVC), and perceived organizational support (POS) on turnover intentions and work engagement, among Finnish managers (n = 1,301). Consequently, the study contributes to the research literature by examining how the ERI-outcomes relationship was dependent simultaneously on OVC and POS. The results showed that ERI x OVC x POS interaction was significant only for turnover intentions. The ERI-turnover intentions relationship was strongest under conditions of high OVC and low POS. In addition, the relationship between ERI and decreased work engagement, especially dedication, was strengthened among overcommitted managers, compared to their less committed counterparts. Altogether, the results indicate that interventions aimed at reducing turnover intentions and increasing work engagement by increasing ERI should consider OVC and POS.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, some cross-sectional studies have revealed that job demands may have a positive link to work engagement (Kinnunen et al., 2008; Schaufeli et al., 2008).”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Kinnunen et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Siegrist, J. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 · Cited by 5,713
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217 · Cited by 2,276
The role of social support in the process of work stress: a meta-analysis
Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1661 · Cited by 1,331
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020858 · Cited by 652
Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators
Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2011) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.524411 · Cited by 282
Self-citationSiltaloppi, M., Kinnunen, U., & Feldt, T. (2009) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370903415572 · Cited by 240
Self-citationSulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.018 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., & Mäkikangas, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 114-127
- ISSN
- 1939-1307
- 1076-8998
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Finnish Work Environment Fund (104129)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
