The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.
Abstract
technical principles to concrete research problems that appear in a wide variety of forms and with a myriad of obscuring features, details, and idiosyncracies. This article is based on a different approach: examination of a series of concrete research scenarios that we have encountered in our work as researchers, advisors to researchers, or reviewers. This article examines 26 real-world case studies and explicates them on the basis of the principles of reliability theory found in Cronbach (1947, 1951) and Cronbach et al. (1972). Although we cite and rely on these sources, other sources (e.g., Thorndike, 1951) would yield identical resolutions; only the terminology would be sometimes (slightly) different. In classical measurement theory, the fundamental general formula for the observed correlation between any two measures, x and y, is yields the dissattenuation formula:
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This method aims to investigate relations on the level of constructs rather than measured values; therefore, it allows correction for the effects of several statistical artifacts, inter alia, concerning measuring accuracy (or more specifically for internal consistencies [78]).”
From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Self-citationEulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
Educational measurement, 3rd ed.
Linn, R. L. (1989) · Cited by 2,858
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
Merrifield, P. R., Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1974) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162145 · Cited by 1,819
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
Campbell, J. P. (1990) · Cited by 1,476
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 568
Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Anderson, N. R. (2016) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.rpto.2015.12.001 · Cited by 19
Estimating the Minimum Sample Size for Neural Network Model Fitting—A Monte Carlo Simulation Study
Cheng, Y., Petrides, K. V., & Li, J. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15020211 · Cited by 21
On measurements and their quality: Paper 1: Reliability – History, issues and procedures
Beckstead, J. W. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.04.005 · Cited by 18
A stakeholder assessment of basketball player evaluation metrics
García, J. A. M., & Martínez, L. (2011) · Journal of Human Sport and Exercise · doi:10.4100/jhse.2011.61.17 · Cited by 18
Casey, T. W., & Poropat, A. E. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.001 · Cited by 19
Martinková, P., Goldhaber, D. D., & Erosheva, E. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203002 · Cited by 17
Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2008) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.551 · Cited by 17
Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: An individual-differences approach
Dowd, E. W., Kiyonaga, A., Egner, T., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0847-z · Cited by 17
Roth, M., & Altmann, T. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.11.008 · Cited by 17
Salgado, J. F. (2015) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12093 · Cited by 19
Donnellan, M. B., & Rakhshani, A. C. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221119532 · Cited by 16
Predicting Intrinsic Motivation.
Martens, R. L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004) · Cited by 16
Boster, F. J. (2012) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.684809 · Cited by 16
Specificity of psychopathology in temporal lobe epilepsy
Foran, A. M., Bowden, S. C., Bardenhagen, F. J., Cook, M. J., & Meade, C. E. (2013) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.12.026 · Cited by 16
The Analysis of Mean Differences Using Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis
Sharma, S., Durvasula, S., & Ployhart, R. E. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428111403154 · Cited by 20
Test–Retest Reliability of Ratings of Job Performance Dimensions in Managers
Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Lado, M. A. (2003) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00230 · Cited by 16
Devine, O. J., & Aral, S. O. (2004) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000140010.25191.b3 · Cited by 16
Chi, H., & Phan, H.-T. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17104304 · Cited by 15
Examining the empirical redundancy of organizational justice constructs
Le, H., & Pan, L. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.004 · Cited by 17
Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02281 · Cited by 15
Clinical Versus Mechanical Prediction
Spengler, P. M. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop210002 · Cited by 15
Ni, F.-Y., Su, C.-C., Chung, S., & Cheng, K. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.921322 · Cited by 15
Tang, X., (曾子欣), Z. Z., Huang, H., & Symonds, J. E. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311251371227 · Cited by 23
Metaanalyse–praktische Schritte und Entscheidungen im Umsetzungsprozess
Schewe, A. F., Hulsheger, U. R., & Maier, G. W. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000165 · Cited by 14
Learning to avoid biased reasoning: effects of interleaved practice and worked examples
van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Kolenbrander, S. V., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & van Gog, T. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1890092 · Cited by 17
Value structure and priorities: Other-report account
Skimina, E., & Cieciuch, J. (2017) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2018.72259 · Cited by 14
An Item Response Theory Analysis of Response Stability in Personality Measurement
Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo‐Seva, U., & Molina, G. (2001) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216010251001 · Cited by 14
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2003) · Handbook of Psychology · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0221 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAn empirical validation study of Spolsky's language policy model
Oss, V. V., Avermaet, P. V., Struys, E., & Vantieghem, W. (2021) · Current Issues in Language Planning · doi:10.1080/14664208.2021.1907060 · Cited by 16
Differences in Trainee Evaluations of Faculty by Rater and Ratee Gender
Cullen, M. J., Zhou, Y., Sackett, P. R., Mustapha, T., Hane, J., & Culican, S. M. (2023) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005260 · Cited by 15
Peters, M. T., Förster, N., Hebbecker, K., Forthmann, B., & Souvignier, E. (2021) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194211011580 · Cited by 25
Beckstead, J. W. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.04.010 · Cited by 13
Construction and First Testing of the UX Kids Questionnaire (UXKQ)
Wöbbekind, L., Mandl, T., & Womser‐Hacker, C. (2021) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3473856.3473875 · Cited by 13
Moore, D. M., & Conway, A. R. A. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11050090 · Cited by 18
Normality assumption in latent interaction models.
Lonati, S., Rönkkö, M., & Antonakis, J. (2024) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000657 · Cited by 12
Kim, S. Y., Shigemoto, Y., Neduvelil, A., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2021) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/00110000211015909 · Cited by 12
"Causes" Of Pesticide Safety Behavior Change in Latino Farmworker Families
Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Talton, J. W., D'Agostino, R. B., Trejo, G., Mirabelli, M. C., & Quandt, S. A. (2013) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.37.4.3 · Cited by 12
Validation of a French Adaptation of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire
Gay, P., d’Acremont, M., Schmidt, R. E., & der Linden, M. V. (2008) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.2.101 · Cited by 12
Ployhart, R. E. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0008 · Cited by 13
A QUESTIONNAIRE BASED METHOD FOR CMMI LEVEL 2 MATURITY ASSESSMENT
Yolcular, F., & Erdoğan, Ş. Z. (2009) · Havacılık ve uzay teknolojileri dergisi · Cited by 12
Validating parent and child forms of the Parent Perception Inventory.
Cole, D. A., Goodman, S. H., Garber, J., Cullum, K. A., Cho, S., Rights, J. D., Felton, J. W., Jacquez, F., Korelitz, K. E., & Simon, H. F. M. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000552 · Cited by 11
Brown, M. I., Grossenbacher, M. A., Martín‐Raugh, M. P., Kochert, J. F., & Prewett, M. S. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12353 · Cited by 11
The Contribution of Metaevaluation to Program Evaluation: Proposition of a Model
Hedler, H. C., & Ribeiro, N. G. (2009) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v6i12.206 · Cited by 11
Variability as a Predictor: A Bayesian Variability Model for Small Samples and Few Repeated MeasuresPreprint
Wiley, J. F., Bei, B., Trinder, J. C., & Manber, R. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.2961 · Cited by 13
Dohmen, T., & Jagelka, T. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics · doi:10.1086/727559 · Cited by 9
Lavelle-Hill, R. E., Smith, G., & Murayama, K. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251345696 · Cited by 11
An Optimized Version of the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) for Pediatric Trials
Findling, R. L., Youngstrom, E. A., McClellan, J., Frazier, J. A., Sikich, L., Daniel, D. G., & Busner, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.864 · Cited by 12
Bootstrapped Deattenuated Correlation
Padilla, M. A., & Veprinsky, A. (2014) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164414531780 · Cited by 10
Predicting the General Factor of Personality: From Adolescence Through Adulthood
Dunkel, C. S., Nedelec, J. L., & van der Linden, D. (2015) · Human Ethology · doi:10.22330/001c.89794 · Cited by 10
Haeny, A. M., Littlefield, A. K., Wood, P. K., & Sher, K. J. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.022 · Cited by 10
A scoping review of research on individual differences in the testing effect paradigm
Smith-Peirce, R. N., & Butler, A. C. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102602 · Cited by 10
Lowman, K. L., Patrick, C. J., Perkins, E. R., Bottesi, G., Caruso, M., Giulini, P., & Sica, C. (2021) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2542 · Cited by 8
COEFFICIENT ALPHA: SOME TERMINOLOGICAL AMBIGUITIES AND RELATED MISCONCEPTIONS
Becker, G. (2000) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.365 · Cited by 9
Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Oh, I. (2013) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12044 · Cited by 9
Self-citationRigoli, L. M., Lorenz, T., Coey, C. A., Kallen, R. W., Jordan, S. J., & Richardson, M. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63056-x · Cited by 9
Automated language-based feedback for teamwork behaviors
Leshed, G. (2009) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 9
Vispoel, W. P., Lee, H., & Chen, T. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12081164 · Cited by 9
Elder, J., Wilson, L., & Calanchini, J. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231171256 · Cited by 11
The Bayesian One-Sample t-Test Supersedes Correlation Analysis as a Test of Validity
Phylactou, P., Παπαδάτου-Παστού, Μ., & Konstantinou, N. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology Open · doi:10.1024/2673-8627/a000069 · Cited by 8
Ock, J. (2020) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12285 · Cited by 9
In Praise of a Cumulative Prevention Science
Price, R. (1997) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1024658127554 · Cited by 8
The Geometry of Enhancement in Multiple Regression
Waller, N. G. (2011) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9220-x · Cited by 8
Balsvik, G. (2004) · Cited by 8
Sedlár, M., & Gurňáková, J. (2024) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2024.2369618 · Cited by 7
The Influence of Students Academic Performance on Their Employability in the Field of Education
HONGJUN, S., JIE, W., BENHAN, H., & YANG, H. (2024) · British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy · doi:10.32996/bjtep.2024.3.2.10 · Cited by 12
The Academic Performance and Upward Mobility of Students in Education Program
Wu, H. J., Bai, S., Liao, Y., & Tan, C. (2024) · Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices · doi:10.32996/jweep.2024.6.1.6 · Cited by 21
Face recognition's practical relevance: Social bonds, not social butterflies
Engfors, L. M., Wilmer, J. B., Palermo, R., Gignac, G. E., Germine, L. T., & Jeffery, L. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105816 · Cited by 8
Marriage Matters: A Description and Initial Examination of a Church-Based Marital Education Program
Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L., Hook, J. P., Miller, B. T., & Davis, D. E. (2011) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11089-011-0398-8 · Cited by 7
Waldrop, A. R., Moss, J. L., Liu, B., & Zhu, L. (2017) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/0033354917727274 · Cited by 7
Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings.
Bologna, N. C., Barlow, D. H., Hollon, S. D., Mitchell, J. E., & Huppert, J. D. (1998) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x · Cited by 7
Becker, G. (2001) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2001.89.2.403 · Cited by 7
The Role of Meta-Analysis in the Significance Test Controversy
Andersson, G. (1999) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027//1016-9040.4.2.75 · Cited by 7
Using multi-method data for more accurate research findings
Mõttus, R., & Henry, S. J. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102075 · Cited by 6
Employee Selection in Times of Change
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (2010) · Wiley-Blackwell eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470661628.ch5 · Cited by 6
Spengler, P. M., White, M. J., Ægisdóttir, S., & Maugherman, A. S. (2007) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000009332008 · Cited by 6
The Self-Contaminating Nature of Repeated Reports of Negative Emotions
Johar, O., & Sackett, A. M. (2018) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1496336 · Cited by 9
Diederich, E., Thomas, L., Mahnken, J. D., & Lineberry, M. C. (2018) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000327 · Cited by 6
Between-Worker Variability in Output Under Piece-Rate Versus Hourly Pay Systems
Judiesch, M. K., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1022932628185 · Cited by 6
Self-citationBecoming Brass: Task-Related and Contextual Components of Military Officer Jobs
Geraghty, B. J., & Collins, J. M. (2003) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1504_1 · Cited by 6
Error in Research and Assessment Data With an Erratum for Meyer (1993)
Meyer, G. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7102_8 · Cited by 6
Chapter 3 Limitations of Economic and Social Indicators
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.003.0003 · Cited by 6
Dåderman, A. M., & Hellström, Å. (2018) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854817747647 · Cited by 5
Goldhaber, D. D., Grout, C., Wolff, M., & Martinková, P. (2021) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102130 · Cited by 6
Jackson, D. J. R., Michaelides, G., Dewberry, C., Jones, A., Toms, S., Schwencke, B., & Yang, W. (2022) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2022.2111433 · Cited by 5
Assessing shortterm individual consistency using IRTbased statistics
Ferrando, P. J. (2010) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 5
THE RELIABILITY OF MEASURING INSTRUMENTS
Knapp, T. R. (2009) · Cited by 5
Využitie a zneužitie Cronbachovej alfy pri hodnotení psychodiagnostických nástrojov
Marko, M. (2016) · TESTFÓRUM · doi:10.5817/tf2016-7-90 · Cited by 6
Comparing Rater Groups: How To Disentangle Rating Reliability From Construct-Level Disagreements
Viswesvaran, C., Öneş, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2016.88 · Cited by 5
Self-citationThe Latent-Variable Structure of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised
Connolly, M. L., Bowden, S. C., Simpson, L. C., Horne, M. K., & McGregor, S. (2019) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acz081 · Cited by 5
Managing Opportunism in China: The Roles ofGuanxi, Environmental Uncertainty, and Management Culture
Wong, A. H. K., Tian, Y. M., & Poon, P. (2016) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2016.1139223 · Cited by 5
Wampold, B. E. (1998) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.46 · Cited by 5
Can Synthetic Validity Methods Achieve Discriminant Validity?
Schmidt, F. L., & Oh, I. (2010) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01249.x · Cited by 5
Self-citationForensic Interviewing for Child Sexual Abuse: Why Psychometrics Matters
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21097-1_9 · Cited by 5
The reliability, convergence, and predictive validity of personality ratings: an other perspective.
Connelly, B. S. (2008) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 5
Obtaining unbiased results in meta-analysis: the importance of correcting for statistical artefactsPreprint
Wiernik, B. M., & Dahlke, J. A. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9mpbn · Cited by 5
Are Mathematics and Writing Skills Related? Evidence from Meta-Analysis
Kim, Y. G., Yang, D., & Hwang, J. K. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09960-4 · Cited by 4
Vispoel, W. P., Lee, H., & Chen, T. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13061001 · Cited by 4
Muhanad, A., Supti, T. I., Abuelezz, I., Yankouskaya, A., Khan, K. M., Barhamgi, M., Nhlabatsi, A., & Ali, R. (2025) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-11-2024-0280 · Cited by 4
Zhao, M. Y., & Tay, L. (2023) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2023.2257656 · Cited by 4
Evaluating Job Demands and Control Measures for Use in Farm Worker Health Surveillance
Alterman, T., Gabbard, S., Grzywacz, J. G., Shen, R., Li, J., Nakamoto, J., Carroll, D. J., & Muntaner, C. (2014) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-014-0090-z · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- ORCID
- Hunter, John E.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-223
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2051130243
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 26.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- measurement error, reliability theory, classical test theory, research scenarios, case studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review