The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors.
Abstract
Calculating and reporting appropriate measures of effect size are becoming standard practice in psychological research. One of the most common scenarios encountered involves the comparison of 2 groups, which includes research designs that are experimental (e.g., random assignment to treatment vs. placebo conditions) and nonexperimental (e.g., testing for gender differences). Familiar measures such as the standardized mean difference (d) or the point-biserial correlation (rpb) characterize the magnitude of the difference between groups, but these effect size measures are sensitive to a number of additional influences. For example, R. E. McGrath and G. J. Meyer (2006) showed that rpb is sensitive to sample base rates, and extending their analysis to situations of unequal variances reveals that d is, too. The probability-based measure A, the nonparametric generalization of what K. O. McGraw and S. P. Wong (1992) called the common language effect size statistic, is insensitive to base rates and more robust to several other factors (e.g., extreme scores, nonlinear transformations). In addition to its excellent generalizability across contexts, A is easy to understand and can be obtained from standard computer output or through simple hand calculations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This effect size corresponds to a 58.4% chance that a randomly selected score of a student who received the intervention is greater than the score of a randomly selected student who did not”
From Targeted school‐based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K‐6: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Ruscio, 2008
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Practical significance: a concept whose time has come
Kirk, R. E. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002 · Cited by 1,778
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7 · Cited by 1,608 · cited 1×
“Rice and Harris (2005) presented tables of equivalent d, r pb , and CL values under the assumptions of normality and equal variances, and they provided conversion formulas that apply in this case.”
MethodCohen, J. (1983) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168300700301 · Cited by 1,564 · cited 2×
“The difference is that when thresholds were applied to dichotomize a continuous independent variable, correlations were reduced (as described by Cohen, 1983).”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes.
Durlak, J. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004 · Cited by 1,487
Inkster, B., Sarda, S., & Subramanian, V. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.12106 · Cited by 1,063
Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009 · Cited by 666
Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e4692 · Cited by 535
Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis
Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018 · Cited by 572
A Practical Primer To Power Analysis for Simple Experimental Designs
Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.181 · Cited by 482
Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover
Maki, A., Carrico, A. R., Raimi, K. T., Truelove, H. B., Araujo, B., & Yeung, K. L. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9 · Cited by 416
Multi-polygenic score approach to trait prediction
Krapohl, E. M. L., Patel, H., Newhouse, S., Curtis, C. J. C., von Stumm, S., Dale, P. S., Zabaneh, D., Breen, G. D., O’Reilly, P. F., & Plomin, R. J. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.163 · Cited by 196
O’Dea, G. A., Youssef, G. J., Hagg, L. J., Francis, L. M., Spry, E. A., Rossen, L., Smith, I., Teague, S. J., Mansour, K., Booth, A., et al. (2023) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-023-01332-1 · Cited by 213
Ruscio, J., Walters, G. D., Marcus, D. K., & Kaczetow, W. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0018259 · Cited by 155
Self-citationKoelewijn, L., Lancaster, T. M., Linden, D. E. J., Dima, D. C., Routley, B. C., Magazzini, L., Barawi, K., Brindley, L. M., Adams, R., Tansey, K. E., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36011 · Cited by 151
Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial
Hoenemeyer, T. W., Kaptchuk, T. J., Mehta, T. S., & Fontaine, K. R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20993-y · Cited by 151
Primer on Risk Assessment and the Statistics Used to Evaluate Its Accuracy
Helmus, L. M., & Babchishin, K. M. (2016) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854816678898 · Cited by 154
What Hypotheses do “Nonparametric” Two-Group Tests Actually Test?
Conroy, R. M. (2012) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1201200202 · Cited by 137
To adjust or not adjust: Nonparametric effect sizes, confidence intervals, and real-world meaning
Ivarsson, A., Andersen, M. B., Johnson, U., & Lindwall, M. (2012) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.007 · Cited by 125
High-resolution connectomic fingerprints: Mapping neural identity and behavior
Sina Mansour, L., Tian, Y., Yeo, B. T. T., Cropley, V., & Zalesky, A. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117695 · Cited by 110
Brankley, A. E., Babchishin, K. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2019) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063219871572 · Cited by 122
Predicting Individual Characteristics from Digital Traces on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis
Settanni, M., Azucar, D., & Marengo, D. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0384 · Cited by 122
van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., & van Solinge, N. F. B. (2017) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.016 · Cited by 138
West, D., Abou Sawan, S., Mazzulla, M., Williamson, E., & Moore, D. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9070735 · Cited by 112
A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience
Wilcox, R. R., & Rousselet, G. A. (2018) · Current Protocols in Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/cpns.41 · Cited by 107
Ruscio, J., & Mullen, T. (2012) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.658329 · Cited by 107
Self-citationAuthorship Bias in Violence Risk Assessment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072484 · Cited by 104
A meta-analysis of the social communication questionnaire: Screening for autism spectrum disorder
Chesnut, S. R., Wei, T., Barnard-Brak, L. M., & Richman, D. M. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361316660065 · Cited by 117
Executive function in Down syndrome: A meta-analysis
Tungate, A. S., & Conners, F. A. (2020) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103802 · Cited by 116
Grice, J. W., Medellin, E., Jones, I. T., Horvath, S., McDaniel, H., O'Lansen, C., & Baker, M. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920922982 · Cited by 97
Babchishin, K., & Helmus, L. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0627-7 · Cited by 97
Sex differences in gray matter volume: how many and how large are they really?
Sanchis‐Segura, C., Ibáñez, M. V., Adrián‐Ventura, J., Aguirre, N., Cruz-Gómez, Á. J., Ávila, C., & Forn, C. (2019) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-019-0245-7 · Cited by 95
Tang, E., Ekundayo, O., Peipert, J. D., Edwards, N., Bansal, A., Richardson, C., Bartlett, S. J., Howell, D., Li, M., Cella, D. F., et al. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-2058-2 · Cited by 95
Lau, K. M., Parikh, M., Harvey, D. J., Huang, C.-J., & Farias, S. T. (2015) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617715000818 · Cited by 89
Mossman, D. (2013) · Behavioral sciences & the law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2050 · Cited by 84
Eisenberg, M. J., van Horn, J. E., Dekker, J. M., Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hendriks, J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854819826109 · Cited by 101
Beyond Cohen's d : Alternative Effect Size Measures for Between-Subject Designs
Peng, C. J., & Chen, L. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.745471 · Cited by 87
The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis.
van den Berg, J. W., Smid, W., Schepers, K., Wever, E. C., van Beek, D., Janssen, E., & Gijs, L. A. C. L. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000454 · Cited by 86
The association between psychopathy and delinquency in juveniles: A three-level meta-analysis
Geerlings, Y., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Assink, M. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.101342 · Cited by 86
Burns, M. K., Zaslofsky, A. F., Kanive, R., & Parker, D. C. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9160-2 · Cited by 85
A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important.
Hanel, P. H. P., Maio, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000154 · Cited by 95
Predicting domestic violence: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of risk assessment tools
van der Put, C. E., Gubbels, J., & Assink, M. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.008 · Cited by 83
Gabarrell‐Pascuet, A., García‐Mieres, H., Giné-Vázquez, I., Moneta, M. V., Koyanagi, A., Haro, J. M., & Domènech‐Abella, J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20042765 · Cited by 97
Ozaki, Y., Tierney, A. T., Pfordresher, P. Q., McBride, J. M., Benetos, E., Proutskova, P., Chiba, G., Liu, F., Jacoby, N., Purdy, S. C., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adm9797 · Cited by 107
Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
Manolov, R., Gast, D. L., Perdices, M., & Evans, J. J. (2014) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.903199 · Cited by 80
Effect size measures in a two-independent-samples case with nonnormal and nonhomogeneous data
Li, J. C. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0667-z · Cited by 79
Disentangling the individual and contextual effects of math anxiety: A global perspective
Lau, N. T. T., Hawes, Z. C. K., Tremblay, P. F., & Ansari, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115855119 · Cited by 78
Social media use in adolescents with and without mental health conditions
Fassi, L., Ferguson, A. M., Przybylski, A. K., Ford, T. J., & Orben, A. C. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4 · Cited by 116
Robinson, M. C., Glen, R. C., & Lee, A. A. (2020) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-019-00274-0 · Cited by 76
Family-based treatments for serious juvenile offenders: A multilevel meta-analysis.
Dopp, A. R., Borduin, C. M., White, M., & Kuppens, S. (2017) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000183 · Cited by 81
The accuracy of effect-size estimates under normals and contaminated normals in meta-analysis
Marfo, P., & Okyere, G. A. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01838 · Cited by 72
Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0 · Cited by 88
Mortality risk of COVID-19 in elderly males with comorbidities: a multi-country study
Li, G., Liu, Y., Jing, X., Wang, Y., Miao, M., Li, T., Zhou, Z., Xie, Y., Huang, Y., Lei, J., et al. (2020) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.202456 · Cited by 74
Hanel, P. H. P., & Mehler, D. M. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519834193 · Cited by 68
Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field
Zhang, L., Feldman, A. G., & Levin, M. F. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00483.2018 · Cited by 66
Crop traits drive soil carbon sequestration under organic farming
García‐Palacios, P., Gattinger, A., Jørgensen, H. B., Brussaard, L., Chichorro, F., Castro, H., Clément, J., Deyn, G. B. D., D’Hertefeldt, T., Foulquier, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13113 · Cited by 63
Soodla, P., Lerkkanen, M., Niemi, P., Kikas, E., Šilinskas, G., & Nurmi, J. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 63
Psychopathy and Violent Reoffending in German-Speaking Countries
Mokros, A., Vohs, K., & Habermeyer, E. (2013) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000178 · Cited by 59
Do Bugs Foreshadow Vulnerabilities? A Study of the Chromium Project
Camilo, F., Meneely, A., & Nagappan, M. (2015) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2015.32 · Cited by 59
Boosting people’s ability to detect microtargeted advertising
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Geers, M., Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94796-z · Cited by 58
Nilsson, M. E., & Schenkman, B. N. (2015) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.012 · Cited by 58
Brouillette-Alarie, S., Proulx, J., & Hanson, R. K. (2017) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063217691965 · Cited by 55
Re, A. M., Tressoldi, P. E., Cornoldi, C., & Lucangeli, D. (2011) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.431 · Cited by 56
Megafauna extinctions have reduced biotic connectivity worldwide
Berti, E., & Svenning, J. (2020) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13182 · Cited by 56
Ramsey, K. A., Meskers, C. G. M., & Maier, A. B. (2021) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00203-8 · Cited by 59
Inkster, B., Kadaba, M., & Subramanian, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Global Women's Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2023.1084302 · Cited by 56
Kishida, Y., & Kemp, C. (2009) · Topics in Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.1177/0271121408329172 · Cited by 62
Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Seerup, J. K., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Eiberg, M. (2021) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1152 · Cited by 54
Indahlastari, A., Albizu, A., Kraft, J. N., O’Shea, A. M., Nissim, N. R., Dunn, A. L., Carballo, D., Gordon, M., Taank, S., Kahn, A. T., et al. (2021) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.08.003 · Cited by 50
The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire: Statistical Considerations for Improved Clinical Application
Mitchell, S. M., Brown, S. L., Roush, J. F., Tucker, R. P., Cukrowicz, K. C., & Joiner, T. E. (2019) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118824660 · Cited by 54
The clinical application of suicide risk assessment: A theory‐driven approach
Mitchell, S. M., Brown, S. L., Roush, J. F., Bolaños, A. D., Littlefield, A. K., Marshall, A. J., Jahn, D. R., Morgan, R. D., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2017) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2086 · Cited by 52
Li, C., Xing, W., & Leite, W. L. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13227 · Cited by 59
Groenestein, E., Willemsen, L. M., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Ket, J. C. F., & Kerkhof, P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308643 · Cited by 84
New Perspectives on Nitrogen Fixation Measurements Using 15N2 Gas
Wannicke, N., Benavides, M., Dalsgaard, T., Dippner, J. W., Montoya, J. P., & Voß, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00120 · Cited by 50
Schwartzman, J. M., Williams, Z. J., & Corbett, B. A. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211025895 · Cited by 53
Home alone: Why people believe others’ social lives are richer than their own.
Deri, S., Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. D. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000105 · Cited by 52
Cortical thinning in military blast compared to non-blast persistent mild traumatic brain injuries
Eierud, C., Nathan, D. E., Bonavia, G. H., Ollinger, J. M., & Riedy, G. P. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101793 · Cited by 48
The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on effect size reporting
Peng, C.-Y. J., Chen, L.-T., Chiang, H.-M., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9218-2 · Cited by 46
Variance Heterogeneity in Published Psychological Research
Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2011) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000034 · Cited by 46
Self-citationGurnani, A. S., & Gavett, B. E. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9334-0 · Cited by 46
An Updated Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience
Wilcox, R. R., & Rousselet, G. A. (2023) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.719 · Cited by 54
Güleş, E., Iosifescu, D. V., & Tural, Ü. (2020) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000505782 · Cited by 42
Lee, S. C., Hanson, R. K., & Blais, J. (2020) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/cap0000182 · Cited by 24
Teixeira, D., Bastos, V., Andrade, A. J., Palmeira, A. L., & Panteleimon Ekkekakis, A. (2024) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-024-01636-0 · Cited by 49
Le, G. H., Wong, S., Haikazian, S., Johnson, D. E., Badulescu, S., Kwan, A. T. H., Gill, H., Vincenzo, J. D. D., Rosenblat, J. D., Mansur, R. B., et al. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.057 · Cited by 40
Computerized Assessment of Pedophilic Sexual Interest Through Self-Report and Viewing Time
Mokros, A., Gebhard, M., Heinz, V., Marschall, R. W., Nitschke, J., Glasgow, D., Gress, C. L. Z., & Laws, D. (2013) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063212454550 · Cited by 38
Wilcox, R. R. (2019) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1551905677 · Cited by 39
A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
Smid, W., Kamphuis, J., Wever, E. C., & van Beek, D. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0036616 · Cited by 41
Lippke, S., Fleig, L., Pomp, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2010) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021563 · Cited by 36
Courel‐Ibáñez, J., Martínez, B. J. S.-Á., Mármol, A. G., Valenzuela, A. V., & Murcia, J. A. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211933 · Cited by 36
Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032231 · Cited by 35
Increased Likelihood of Falling in Older Cannabis Users vs. Non-Users
Workman, C. D., Fietsam, A. C., Sosnoff, J. J., & Rudroff, T. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11020134 · Cited by 37
Lee, S. C., & Hanson, R. K. (2017) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854817711477 · Cited by 35
Wang, R., Song, Y., Yang, L., & Browning, M. H. E. M. (2024) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128324 · Cited by 36
Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Jensen, U. H. (2020) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1081 · Cited by 33
A tutorial on probabilistic index models: Regression models for the effect size P(Y1 < Y2).
Schryver, M. D., & Neve, J. D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000194 · Cited by 35
Can Mentoring Promote Self-esteem and School Connectedness? An Evaluation of the Mentor-UP Project
Marino, C., Santinello, M., Lenzi, M., Santoro, P., Bergamin, M., Gaboardi, M., Calcagnì, A., Altoè, G., & Perkins, D. D. (2019) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2019a13 · Cited by 32
Individual differences in anchoring: Traits and experience
Welsh, M. B., Delfabbro, P., Burns, N. R., & Begg, S. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.002 · Cited by 32
Elevated body temperature is associated with depressive symptoms: results from the TemPredict Study
Mason, A. E., Kasl, P., Soltani, S., Green, A., Hartogensis, W., Dilchert, S., Chowdhary, A., Pandya, L. S., Siwik, C. J., Foster, S. L., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51567-w · Cited by 31
Wang, X., & Zhou, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1414152 · Cited by 31
Zhang, S., Heck, P. R., Meyer, M. N., Chabris, C. F., Goldstein, D. G., & Hofman, J. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2302491120 · Cited by 30
Chandler, H. L., Wise, R. G., Murphy, K., Tansey, K. E., Linden, D. E. J., & Lancaster, T. M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36820-3 · Cited by 31
Effects of task constraints on training workload in elite women’s soccer
Ibáñez, S. J., Pérez-Goye, E., García-Rubio, J., & Courel‐Ibáñez, J. (2019) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/1747954119891158 · Cited by 30
Altoè, G., Bertoldo, G., Callegher, C. Z., Toffalini, E., Calcagnì, A., Finos, L., & Pastore, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02893 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruscio, J.
- Affiliations
- The College of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ruscio, John
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-30
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2012259509
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- effect size, standardized mean difference, point-biserial correlation, heteroscedasticity, robustness, two-group comparison
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Models, Psychological, Models, Statistical, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review