The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude.
Abstract
Three studies tested a new model of gratitude, which specified the generative mechanisms linking individual differences (trait gratitude) and objective situations with the amount of gratitude people experience after receiving aid (state gratitude). In Study 1, all participants (N = 253) read identical vignettes describing a situation in which they received help. People higher in trait gratitude made more positive beneficial appraisals (seeing the help as more valuable, more costly to provide, and more altruistically intended), which fully mediated the relationship between trait and state levels of gratitude. Study 2 (N = 113) replicated the findings using a daily process study in which participants reported on real events each day for up to 14 days. In Study 3, participants (N = 200) read vignettes experimentally manipulating objective situations to be either high or low in benefit. Benefit appraisals were shown to have a causal effect on state gratitude and to mediate the relationship between different prosocial situations and state gratitude. The 3 studies demonstrate the critical role of benefit appraisals in linking state gratitude with trait gratitude and the objective situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.377 · Cited by 3,826 · cited 4×
“Such an approach would have to be evaluated alongside the current successful approach of “counting your blessings” ( Emmons & McCullough, 2003 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialPursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111 · Cited by 3,203
McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 3×
“Gratitude has been shown to correlate moderately with the Big Five personality traits (McCullough et al., 2001), which appear to represent personality at the highest level of abstraction (Costa & McCrae, 1995; Goldberg, 1993; McCrae & Costa, 1999).”
BackgroundFleeson, W. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00280.x · Cited by 649
Cited by
The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing
Palmatier, R. W., Jarvis, C. B., Bechkoff, J. R., & Kardes, F. R. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.1 · Cited by 912
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003 · Cited by 761
Self-citationGeraghty, A. W. A., Wood, A. M., & Hyland, M. E. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.007 · Cited by 241
Self-citationThe role of gratitude in spiritual well-being in asymptomatic heart failure patients.
Mills, P. J., Redwine, L., Wilson, K., Pung, M. A., Chinh, K., Greenberg, B. H., Lunde, O., Maisel, A., Raisinghani, A., Wood, A., et al. (2015) · Spirituality in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1037/scp0000050 · Cited by 132
Self-citationFamily dysfunction and Adolescents' anxiety and depression: A multiple mediation model
Wang, Y., Tian, L., Guo, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101090 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S.
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-290
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2138178454
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
