Cited by 912Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product InnovationMarketing and Advertising Strategies

The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing

Palmatier, Robert W., Jarvis, Cheryl Burke, Bechkoff, Jennifer R., Kardes, Frank R.·2009·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Most theories of relationship marketing emphasize the role of trust and commitment in affecting performance outcomes; however, a recent meta-analysis indicates that other mediating mechanisms are at work. Data from two studies—a laboratory experiment and a dyadic longitudinal field survey—demonstrate that gratitude also mediates the influence of a seller's relationship marketing investments on performance outcomes. Specifically, relationship marketing investments generate short-term feelings of gratitude that drive long-lasting performance benefits based on gratitude-related reciprocal behaviors. The authors identify a set of managerially relevant factors and test their power to alter customer perceptions of relationship marketing investments to increase customer gratitude, which can make relationship marketing programs more effective. Overall, the research empirically demonstrates that gratitude plays an important role in understanding how relationship marketing investments increase purchase intentions, sales growth, and share of wallet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkg.73.5.1

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investing time, effort, and other resources creates psychological bonds and cultivates mutual understanding, trust, satisfaction, and commitment.

    “Investing time, effort, and other resources create psychological bonds (De Wulf et al. 2001) and cultivate mutual understanding, trust, satisfaction, and commitment (e.g., Gwinner et al. 1998; Palmatier et al. 2009).”

    From Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Palmatier et al. 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmatier, R. W., Jarvis, C. B., Bechkoff, J. R., & Kardes, F. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
  • Palmatier, Robert W.
  • Jarvis, Cheryl Burke
  • Bechkoff, Jennifer R.
  • Kardes, Frank R.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2009-09
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2103403045
Cited by
912
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 34
FWCI
49.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
customer gratitude, relationship marketing, reciprocal behavior, purchase intention, sales growth, share of wallet, trust, customer commitment, mediating mechanisms, consumer perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review