Cited by 132Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The role of gratitude in spiritual well-being in asymptomatic heart failure patients.

Open access
Mills, Paul J., Redwine, Laura, Wilson, Kathleen, Pung, Meredith A., Chinh, Kelly, Greenberg, Barry H., Lunde, Ottar, Maisel, Alan +3 more·2015·Spirituality in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Spirituality and gratitude are associated with wellbeing. Few if any studies have examined the role of gratitude in heart failure (HF) patients or whether it is a mechanism through which spirituality may exert its beneficial effects on physical and mental health in this clinical population. This study examined associations bet ween gratitude, spiritual wellbeing, sleep, mood, fatigue, cardiac-specific self-efficacy, and inflammation in 186 men and women with Stage B asymptomatic HF (age 66.5 years ±10). In correlational analysis, gratitude was associated with better sleep (r=-.25, p<0.01), less depressed mood (r=-.41, p<0.01), less fatigue (r=-.46, p<0.01), and better self-efficacy to maintain cardiac function (r=.42, p<0.01). Patients expressing more gratitude also had lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers (r=-.17, p<0.05). We further explored relationships among these variables by examining a putative pathway to determine whether spirituality exerts its beneficial effects through gratitude. We found that gratitude fully mediated the relationship between spiritual wellbeing and sleep quality (z=-2.35, SE=.03, p=.02) and also the relationship between spiritual wellbeing and depressed mood (z=-4.00, SE=.075, p<.001). Gratitude also partially mediated the relationships between spiritual wellbeing and fatigue (z=-3.85, SE=.18, p<.001), and between spiritual wellbeing and self-efficacy (z=2.91, SE=.04, p=.003). In sum, we report that gratitude and spiritual wellbeing are related to better mood and sleep, less fatigue, and more self-efficacy, and that gratitude fully or partially mediates the beneficial effects of spiritual wellbeing on these endpoints. Efforts to increase gratitude may be a treatment for improving wellbeing in HF patients' lives and be of potential clinical value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/scp0000050

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

12 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 4 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Finding

    Spiritual wellbeing was related to the same outcomes except the inflammatory index.

    “Spiritual wellbeing was related to each of these as well, with the exception of the inflammatory index.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    The authors conclude that gratitude and spiritual wellbeing are key positive factors to consider in this population.

    “Gratitude and spiritual wellbeing are key positive factors to consider in this population.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    In stage B asymptomatic heart failure patients, gratitude was related to better mood and sleep, more self-efficacy, and lower fatigue and inflammation.

    “In stage B asymptomatic HF patients, we found that gratitude was related to better mood and sleep, more self-efficacy, and lower fatigue and inflammation.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    The paper concludes that efforts to increase gratitude may be a treatment for improving wellbeing in heart failure patients and may have clinical value.

    “Efforts to increase gratitude may be a treatment for improving wellbeing in HF patients’ lives and be of potential clinical value.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Patients expressing more gratitude also had lower levels of the inflammatory biomarker index.

    “Patients expressing more gratitude also had lower levels of the inflammatory biomarker index (p<0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: t(158)=3.087, p < .001

    Minor

    The paper reports p < .001 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .002 (two-tailed). The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .002

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upt(158) = 3.087reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .002

    “t(158)=3.087, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(166) = -3.82reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(166)=−3.82, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(169) = 8.58reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(169)=8.58, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(167) = -2.42reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .017

    “t(167)=−2.42, p = .02”

  • Consistentt(167) = 1.89reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .060

    “t(167)=1.89, p = .06”

  • Consistentt(157) = -4.765reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(157)=−4.765, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(158) = -4.536reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(158)=−4.536, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(156) = -1.663reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .098

    “t(156)=−1.663, p = .10”

  • Consistentt(163) = -7.342reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(163)=−7.342, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(162) = -4.318reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(162)=−4.318, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(162) = -4.02reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(162)=−4.020, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(159) = 6.453reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(159)=6.453, p < .001”

12 of 12

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Self-efficacy mediation reports an impossible t-statistic/β pair

    Major

    The reported Step 3 and Step 4 values for self-efficacy are inconsistent: the t-statistics are about 3, but the stated coefficients differ by only 0.058, which is not enough to support the reported shift in significance pattern. The text also has a malformed parenthesis that makes the reported Step 4 value ambiguous.

    Reported 3.087 · recomputed 0.058

  • Sleep regression's coefficient and t statistic have opposite signs

    Minor

    A coefficient and its t statistic must have the same sign because the standard error is positive. The sleep model reports a negative coefficient but a positive t statistic.

  • Self-efficacy p values reverse the ordering of their t statistics

    Minor

    Both tests report 158 degrees of freedom. The smaller absolute t statistic, 3.087, cannot have p<.001 when the larger one, 3.10, has p=.002.

  • Inflammatory factor explains a different percentage of variance

    Minor

    The index lists five biomarkers. An eigenvalue of 3.23 therefore accounts for 64.6% of their total variance, not 53.8%.

    Reported 53.8 · recomputed 64.6

  • Inflammation regression's beta conflicts with its R-squared

    Minor

    For a simple regression, the square of a standardized beta equals R-squared. The reported beta would imply an R-squared of 1.0404, rather than .01.

    Reported 0.01 · recomputed 1.0404

  • Depressed-mood coefficients use different degrees of freedom for the same model

    Minor

    Steps 3 and 4 describe the two coefficients in the model containing both gratitude and spiritual wellbeing as predictors of depressed mood. Their reported t statistics have different degrees of freedom, 158 and 156.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, P. J., Redwine, L., Wilson, K., Pung, M. A., Chinh, K., Greenberg, B. H., Lunde, O., Maisel, A., Raisinghani, A., Wood, A., & Chopra, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Venue
Spirituality in Clinical Practice
Published
2015-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 2326-4500 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-4519
OpenAlex
W2135076712
Cited by
132
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Spirituality in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HL-073355, HL-096784, and 1UL1RR031980-01)
  • Greater Good Science Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
gratitude, spiritual well-being, asymptomatic heart failure, sleep quality, depressive mood, fatigue, inflammation, inflammatory markers, mediation, spirituality and health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review