Cited by 781LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internalized homophobia and relationship quality among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals.

Open access
Frost, David M., Meyer, Ilan H.·2009·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

We examined the associations between internalized homophobia, outness, community connectedness, depressive symptoms, and relationship quality among a diverse community sample of 396 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals. Structural equation models showed that internalized homophobia was associated with greater relationship problems both generally and among coupled participants independent of outness and community connectedness. Depressive symptoms mediated the association between internalized homophobia and relationship problems. This study improves current understandings of the association between internalized homophobia and relationship quality by distinguishing between the effects of the core construct of internalized homophobia and its correlates and outcomes. The findings are useful for counselors interested in interventions and treatment approaches to help LGB individuals cope with internalized homophobia and relationship problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012844

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ouellette SC Dohrenwend BP 1998 The value and limitations of stress models in HIV/AIDS Adversity, stress, and psycho-pathology 142 160 New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2009
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
97-109
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2128483459
Cited by
781
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 29
FWCI
34.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066058-03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
internalized homophobia, relationship quality, relationship problems, outness, community ties, depressive symptoms, mediation, lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, LGB individuals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review