Cited by 116LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Exploring Sexual Minority Women’s Experiences of External and Internalized Heterosexism and Sexism and their Links to Coping and Distress

Szymanski, Dawn M., Henrichs-Beck, Christy·2014·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szymanski, D. M., & Henrichs-Beck, C.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Szymanski, Dawn M.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2013-10-26
Volume
70
Issue
1-2
Pages
28-42
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2019113182
Cited by
116
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
sexual minority women, lesbians, bisexual women, heterosexism, internalized heterosexism, sexism, internalized sexism, coping strategies, psychological distress, reactive coping, multiple oppressions, maladaptive coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review