Cited by 307Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceCareer Development and Diversity

An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years.

Marsh, Herbert W., Pekrun, Reinhard, Murayama, Kou, Arens, A. Katrin, Parker, Philip D., Guo, Jiesi, Dicke, Theresa·2018·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Our newly proposed integrated academic self-concept model integrates 3 major theories of academic self-concept formation and developmental perspectives into a unified conceptual and methodological framework. Relations among math self-concept (MSC), school grades, test scores, and school-level contextual effects over 6 years, from the end of primary school through the first 5 years of secondary school (a representative sample of 3,370 German students, 42 secondary schools, 50% male, M age at grade 5 = 11.75) support the (1) internal/external frame of reference model: Math school grades had positive effects on MSC, but the effects of German grades were negative; (2) reciprocal effects (longitudinal panel) model: MSC was predictive of and predicted by math test scores and school grades; (3) big-fish-little-pond effect: The effects on MSC were negative for school-average achievement based on 4 indicators (primary school grades in math and German, school-track prior to the start of secondary school, math test scores in the first year of secondary school). Results for all 3 theoretical models were consistent across the 5 secondary school years: This supports the prediction of developmental equilibrium. This integration highlights the robustness of support over the potentially volatile early to middle adolescent period; the interconnectedness and complementarity of 3 ASC models; their counterbalancing strengths and weaknesses; and new theoretical, developmental, and substantive implications at their intersections. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000393

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies use large sample sizes and longitudinal data of up to six waves, allowing changes in motivation and achievement of students to be tracked across their school career.

    “More recent studies showcase impressive efforts of researchers to use large sample sizes and longitudinal data of up to six waves, allowing changes in motivation and achievement of students to be tracked across their school career (e.g., Marsh et al., 2018;Murayama et al., 2013).”
  • Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon suggests that domain-specific academic self-concept, more so than general academic self-concept, is influenced by social comparison.

    “Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon (i.e., students in high-achieving classes having lower ASC than those with comparable aptitude in regular classes) suggests that domain-specific ASC (more so than general ASC) is influenced by social comparison (Fang et al., 2018;Marsh et al., 2018).”
  • In almost every study investigating reciprocal motivation and achievement relations, the need for experimental designs in which either motivation or achievement is manipulated is raised as a suggestion for future research.

    “In almost every study investigating reciprocal motivation and achievement relations, the need for experimental designs in which either motivation or achievement is manipulated is raised as a suggestion for future research (Marsh et al., 2016(Marsh et al., , 2018;;Mega et al., 2014;Pinxten et al., 2014).”
  • When extant research finds relationships between motivation and achievement, the interpretation with regards to causal relations remains difficult due to the lack of experimental manipulation.

    “When extant research finds the relationships between motivation and achievement, the interpretation with regards to causal relations remains difficult due to the lack of experimental manipulation (Granger, 1980;Holland, 1986;Marsh et al., 2018;Mega et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Arens, A. K., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Dicke, T.
Affiliations
Kochi University of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Herbert W.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2018-02
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
263-280
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2737631252
Cited by
306
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP130102713)
  • German Research Foundation (PE 320/11-1, PE 320/11-2, PE 320/11-3, PE 320/11-4)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
academic self-concept, mathematics self-concept, self-concept development, big-fish-little-pond effect, reciprocal effects, school grades, test scores, educational tracking, adolescents, K-12 education
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Child, Psychology, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Likelihood Functions, Multilevel Analysis, Mathematical Concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review