Cited by 284Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance

Open access
de Boer, Hester, Bosker, Roel J., van der Werf, Margaretha P. C.·2010·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

In this article, we address the relationship between teacher expectation bias and student characteristics, its effect on long-term student performance, and the development of this effect over time. Expectation bias was defined as the difference between observed and predicted teacher expectation. These predicted expectations were estimated from a multilevel model in which teacher expectations of students' future performance in secondary education were regressed on students' prior achievement, IQ, and achievement motivation. Multilevel analyses were performed on a data set of about 11,000 students who entered secondary school in 1999 and who were monitored for 5 years. We found relationships between teacher expectation bias and student characteristics as well as a clear effect of expectation bias on long-term student performance. Teacher expectation bias partly mediated the effects of student characteristics on students' performance. Moreover, its effect was moderated by some of these characteristics. Mediation and moderation effects were the strongest for parents' aspirations. The effects of teacher expectation bias dissipated partly during the first 2 years but afterwards remained stable over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017289

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2010-02
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
168-179
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2050671299
Cited by
284
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
teacher expectations, student performance, long-term academic outcomes, prior achievement, IQ, achievement motivation, parental aspirations, mediation, moderation, secondary education, student characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review