Cited by 56Mental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric properties of a computerized mobile phone method for assessing mood in daily life

Open access
Courvoisier, Delphine S., Eid, Michael, Lischetzke, Tanja, Schreiber, Walter H.·2010·Emotion

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment is a method that is now largely used to study behavior and mood in the settings in which they naturally occur. It maximizes ecological validity and avoids the limitations of retrospective self-reports. Studies on the psychometric properties of scales administered via mobile phone ecological momentary assessment are lacking. Therefore, we collected data on a 4-item mood scale measuring well being on six occasions per day for 7 days (N = 307) and examined compliance rate across time, within day, and within week. Using specific latent state-trait structural equation models, we analyzed the degree to which interindividual mood differences on an occasion of measurement were because of (a) measurement error, (b) stable differences in mood level, and (c) occasion-specific differences. Results show good compliance (mean compliance: 74.9% of calls answered). Moreover, the scale showed good reliability (M = .82). Mood was mostly stable, especially the first 3 days of the week. It depended weakly albeit significantly on the previous assessment (autoregressive coefficient). In conclusion, computerized mobile phone assessment is an appropriate, easy-to-use, and promising method to measure mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017813

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Courvoisier, D. S., Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., & Schreiber, W. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2010-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
115-124
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W1977831800
Cited by
56
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, mood measurement, well-being, psychometric properties, scale reliability, compliance, latent state-trait models, measurement error, autoregressive effects
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Compliance, Psychometrics, Sex Factors, Software, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review