Cited by 53Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPediatric Pain Management TechniquesNursing care and research

Protective and exacerbating factors in children and adolescents with fibromyalgia

Libby, Christopher J., Glenwick, David S.·2010·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate protective and exacerbating factors in the adjustment of youth with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS), we examined the relationship of stress, coping strategies, social support, and self-efficacy to quality of life, pain, and depression. METHOD: Participants were 57 youths (ages 10 to 18 years) and their parents from rheumatology clinics at 2 children's hospitals. The youths self-reported daily hassles, coping strategies, social support, self-efficacy, quality of life, pain, and depression. Parents reported on the youths' major life events and quality of life. RESULTS: In regression analyses, daily hassles, catastrophizing (a coping strategies scale), and self-efficacy predicted child-rated quality of life; self-efficacy predicted pain; and daily hassles predicted depression. Self-efficacy and familial social support moderated the relationship between daily hassles and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Daily hassles may be associated with health outcomes for youth with JPFS more than major life events are, and catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy beliefs could be appropriate intervention targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019518

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black individuals are more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to have hypertension and show cardiovascular reactivity to pain.

    “Black individuals are more prone than non-Hispanic Whites to experience hypertension and show cardiovascular reactivity to pain, which may, in turn, influence their pain perception 230.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Libby, C. J., & Glenwick, D. S.
Affiliations
Fordham University (US)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2010-05
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2086996573
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arthritis Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
daily hassles, catastrophizing, coping strategies, self-efficacy, social support, quality of life, pain, depression, major life events, protective factors, exacerbating factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Chronic Disease, Female, Fibromyalgia, Health Status, Humans, Male, Pain, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review