CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 279Cultural Differences and ValuesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Communalism, familism, and filial piety: Are they birds of a collectivist feather?

Open access
Schwartz, Seth J., Weisskirch, Robert S., Hurley, Eric A., Zamboanga, Byron L., Park, Irene J. K., Kim, Su Yeong, Umaña-Taylor, Adriana, Castillo, Linda G., Brown, Elissa, Greene, Anthony D.·2010·Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0021370PMC PMC7869140
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present studies examined the extent to which (a) communalism, familism, and filial piety would pattern onto a single family/relationship primacy construct; (b) this construct would be closely related to indices of collectivism; and (c) this construct would be related to positive psychosocial functioning and psychological distress. In Study 1, 1,773 students from nine colleges and universities around the United States completed measures of communalism, familism, and filial piety, as well as of individualistic and collectivistic values. Results indicated that communalism, familism, and filial piety clustered onto a single factor. This factor, to which we refer as family/relationship primacy, was closely and positively related to collectivism but only weakly and positively related to individualism and independence. In Study 2, 10,491 students from 30 colleges and universities in 20 U.S. states completed measures of communalism, familism, and filial piety, as well as of positive psychosocial functioning and psychological distress. The family/relationship primacy factor again emerged and was positively associated with both positive psychosocial functioning and psychological distress. Clinical implications and future directions for the study of cultural values are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021370

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boykin AW, & Allen BA (2003). Cultural integrity and schooling outcomes of African American schoolchildren from low-income backgrounds In Pufall P & Undsworth R (Eds.), Childhood revisited. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  2. Boykin AW, Jagers RJ, Ellison C, & Albury A (1997). The communalism scale: Conceptualization and measurement of an Afrocultural social ethos. Journal of Black Studies, 27, 409– 418.
  3. Pavot W, & Diener E (1993). Review of the satisfactions with life scales. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164– 177.
  4. Stepick A, Dutton Stepick C, & Vanderkooy P (in press). Becoming American In Schwartz SJ, Luyckx K, & Vignoles VL (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 279

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, S. J., Weisskirch, R. S., Hurley, E. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Park, I. J. K., Kim, S. Y., Umaña-Taylor, A., Castillo, L. G., Brown, E., & Greene, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • California State University, Monterey Bay (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
  • Smith College (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • St. John's University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
ORCID
Venue
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2010-10
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
548-560
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
DOI
10.1037/a0021370
PMC
PMC7869140
OpenAlex
W2003065789
Cited by
279
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
communalism, familism, filial piety, collectivism, individualism, independence, cultural values, psychological distress, university students
MeSH terms
Adult, Ethnicity, Family, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Support, Social Values, Students, United States, Universities, Intergenerational Relations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review