Cited by 241Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Sudden gains during psychological treatments of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis

Aderka, Idan M., Nickerson, Angela, Bøe, Hans Jakob, Hofmann, Stefan G.·2012·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study quantitatively reviewed the literature on sudden gains in psychological treatments for anxiety and depression. The authors examined the short- and long-term effects of sudden gains on treatment outcome as well as moderators of these effects. METHOD: The authors conducted a literature search using PubMed, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and manual searches. The meta-analysis was based on 16 studies and included 1,104 participants receiving psychological treatment for major depressive disorder or an anxiety disorder. RESULTS: Effect size estimates suggest that sudden gains had a moderate effect on primary outcome measures at posttreatment (Hedges's g = 0.62) and follow-up (Hedges's g = 0.56). These effect sizes were robust and unrelated to publication year or number of treatment sessions. The effect size of sudden gains in cognitive-behavioral therapy was higher (Hedges's g = 0.75) than in other treatments (Hedges's g = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sudden gains are associated with short-term and long-term improvements in depression and anxiety, especially in cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0026455

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aderka, I. M., Nickerson, A., Bøe, H. J., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
93-101
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2127477641
Cited by
240
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
sudden gains, psychological intervention, anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcomes, treatment moderators, long-term treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review