The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders.
Open accessAbstract
Two issues pertinent to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) proposal for personality pathology, the recovery of DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs) by proposed DSM-5 traits and the validity of the proposed DSM-5 hybrid model, which incorporates both personality pathology symptoms and maladaptive traits, were evaluated in a large undergraduate sample (N = 808). Proposed DSM-5 traits as assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 explained a substantial proportion of variance in DSM-IV PDs as assessed with the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+, and trait indicators of the 6 proposed DSM-5 PDs were mostly specific to those disorders with some exceptions. Regression analyses support the DSM-5 hybrid model in that pathological traits, and an indicator of general personality pathology severity provided incremental information about PDs. Findings are discussed in the context of broader issues around the proposed DSM-5 model of personality disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
Self-citationReinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213 · Cited by 1,171
Self-citationPathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder
Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131215 · Cited by 1,082 · cited 1×
“For instance, clinical theories emphasize vulnerable and antagonistic aspects of pathological narcissism, and the narrow focus on overt grandiosity in the symptom sets has been a criticism of the DSM–IV definition by clinical theorists (Cain, Pincus, & Ansell, 2008; Pincus & Lukowitsky, 2010).”
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,018
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model.
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.71 · Cited by 957
Krueger, R. F., & Eaton, N. R. (2010) · Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment · doi:10.1037/a0018990 · Cited by 244
Self-citationA Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumples Scales
Soldz, S., Budman, S., Demby, A., & Merry, J. (1995) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191195002001006 · Cited by 224
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders
MOREY, L. C., HOPWOOD, C. J., GUNDERSON, J. G., SKODOL, A. E., SHEA, M. T., YEN, S., STOUT, R. L., ZANARINI, M. C., GRILO, C. M., SANISLOW, C. A., et al. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706009482 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Cited by
Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z · Cited by 322
Self-citationAl-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572 · Cited by 303
Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders
Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3 · Cited by 292
Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism and the DSM–5 Pathological Personality Trait Model
Miller, J. D., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., & Campbell, W. K. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.685907 · Cited by 145
Conceptions of Narcissism and the DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits
Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113486692 · Cited by 129
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 424-432
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2112040301
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 37.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0026656
- The paper
- Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
