Cited by 145Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism and the DSM–5 Pathological Personality Trait Model

Miller, Joshua D., Gentile, Brittany, Wilson, Lauren, Campbell, W. Keith·2013·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Personality Disorders (4th ed., American Psychiatric Association, 2000) personality disorders (PDs) that will be included in the DSM-5 will be diagnosed in an entirely different manner; the explicit criterion sets will be replaced with impairments in self and interpersonal functioning and personality traits from a 25-trait dimensional model of personality pathology. From a trait perspective, narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), the focus of this study, is assessed using 2 specific traits: grandiosity and attention seeking. Using a sample collected online from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk; N=306), we examined the relations among traits from a new measure of DSM-5's trait model--the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, in press)--and grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. The 25 traits from PID5 captured a significant portion of the variance in grandiose and vulnerable factors, although the 2 specific facets designated for the assessment of NPD fared substantially better in the assessment of grandiose rather than vulnerable narcissism. These results are discussed in the context of improving the DSM-5's ability to capture both narcissism dimensions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2012.685907

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both grandiose and vulnerable manifestations of narcissism are characterized by entitlement-a belief that one is deserving of special benefits and attention.

    “Both manifestations are characterized by entitlement—a belief that one is deserving of special benefits and attention (7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. D., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., & Campbell, W. K.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2013-05
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
284-290
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W1997648925
Cited by
145
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, DSM-5, personality disorders, PID-5, grandiosity, attention seeking
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Narcissism, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review