Cited by 106Personality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion.

Open access

Abstract

Greater levels of conscientiousness have been associated with lower levels of negative affect. We focus on one mechanism through which conscientiousness may decrease negative affect: effective emotion regulation, as reflected by greater recovery from negative stimuli. In 273 adults who were 35-85 years old, we collected self-report measures of personality including conscientiousness and its self-control facet, followed on average 2 years later by psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity and recovery. Among middle-aged adults (35-65 years old), the measures of conscientiousness and self-control predicted greater recovery from, but not reactivity to, negative emotional stimuli. The effect of conscientiousness and self-control on recovery was not driven by other personality variables or by greater task adherence on the part of high conscientiousness individuals. In addition, the effect was specific to negative emotional stimuli and did not hold for neutral or positive emotional stimuli.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028105

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Javaras, K. N., Schaefer, S. M., van Reekum, C. M., Lapate, R. C., Greischar, L. L., Bachhuber, D. R., Love, G. D., Ryff, C. D., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Javaras, Kristin N.
Venue
Emotion
Published
2012
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
875-881
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2162742607
Cited by
105
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Aging (P01-AG020166)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH084051 and R01 MH043454)
  • Fetzer Institute
  • Baumann Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
conscientiousness, self-control, emotional recovery, emotional reactivity, negative affect, emotion regulation, personality traits, middle-aged adults, emotional stimuli
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Inventory, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review