Cited by 58Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingReading and Literacy Development

Reevaluating key evidence for the development of rehearsal: Phonological similarity effects in children are subject to proportional scaling artifacts.

Open access
Jarrold, Christopher, Citroën, Rebecca·2013·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The size of an individual's phonological similarity effect for visually presented material is assumed to reflect his or her ability to recode, and by implication rehearse, information in verbal short-term memory. Many studies have shown that under these conditions, the size of this effect interacts with age, tending to be nonsignificant in children younger than 7 years and leading to the conclusion that children of this age do not rehearse. In the present study, the size of the phonological similarity effect was assessed in a total of 116 children aged between 5 and 9 years, manipulating the modality of both encoding and retrieval of the memoranda. Although the interaction between age and the size of the phonological similarity effect was replicated with visual presentation and verbal recall of material, this interaction was also present in other conditions that do not require recoding. In addition, the data from this "classic" condition were simulated by a model that assumed that the size of the similarity effect is (a) proportional to an individual's recall of dissimilar items and (b) constrained by a functional floor to recall of similar items. These findings undermine the evidence for a qualitative change in recoding and rehearsal at 7 years and question the extent to which rehearsal is necessary to explain the development of verbal short-term memory performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028771

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of phonological similarity effects may emerge around age 7 not because of an adoption of rehearsal strategies at this time, but as a result of gradual changes in overall recall skill.

    “Thus, evidence of phonological similarity effects may emerge around age 7 not because of an adoption of rehearsal strategies at this time, but as a result of gradual changes in overall recall skill.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Jarrold and Citroen (2013)

    The indexed title says phonological similarity effects in children are subject to proportional scaling artifacts, supporting the possibility that their apparent emergence need not reflect rehearsal. The available passages are bibliographic material, however, and do not state that the effects emerge around age 7 or link them specifically to gradual changes in overall recall skill. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence or absence of a phonological similarity effect should not be taken to indicate a specific, qualitative shift in children's inner speech strategies.

    “suggests that the presence or absence of a phonological similarity effect should not be taken to indicate a specific, qualitative shift in children’s inner speech strategies”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Jarrold & Citroen, 2013

    The paper’s title (no page given) says that phonological similarity effects in children are subject to proportional scaling artifacts and reevaluates their use as evidence for the development of rehearsal. The available passages do not address whether the presence or absence of the effect indicates a qualitative shift in children’s inner speech strategies; searches for that claim returned only title and bibliographic material. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarrold, C., & Citroën, R.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
837-847
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2133781004
Cited by
58
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-2467 and RES-062-23-1199)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
rehearsal, verbal short-term memory, phonological similarity effect, recoding, children's memory development, proportional scaling, age differences, visual presentation, word recall
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Phonetics, Photic Stimulation, Mental Recall, Regression Analysis, Verbal Learning, Artifacts, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review