Cited by 938Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Verbal and Visuospatial Short-Term and Working Memory in Children: Are They Separable?

Open access
Alloway, Tracy Packiam, Gathercole, Susan Elizabeth, Pickering, Susan J·2006·Child Development

Abstract

This study explored the structure of verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children between ages 4 and 11 years. Multiple tasks measuring 4 different memory components were used to capture the cognitive processes underlying working memory. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the processing component of working memory tasks was supported by a common resource pool, while storage aspects depend on domain-specific verbal and visuospatial resources. This model is largely stable across this developmental period, although some evidence exists that the links between the domain-specific visuospatial construct and the domain-general processing construct were higher in the 4- to- 6-year age group. The data also suggest that all working memory components are in place by 4 years of age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The working memory system has a single central executive controller that operates on functionally and anatomically separate phonological and visuospatial short-term memory subsystems.

    “These approaches are based on compelling evidence that the working memory system is characterized by a single central executive controller that operates on the functionally and anatomically separate phonological and visuospatial short-term memory subsystems (Baddeley, 2007; Alloway et al., 2006; Smith et al., 1996).”

    From Working memory and short-term memory deficits in ADHD: A bifactor modeling approach (2020) · cites this paper as Alloway et al., 2006

    The paper’s introductory discussion of the Baddeley and Hitch model describes a central executive and separate verbal and visuospatial storage systems; its Discussion also reports evidence for domain-general working memory alongside domain-specific short-term storage. Our copy does not establish that the phonological and visuospatial subsystems are anatomically separate, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Support for the bifactor model includes replicated evidence that phonological and visuospatial storage systems are functionally and anatomically distinct and that a single domain-general central executive exists rather than separate central executives for each modality.

    “Support for this model includes replicated evidence that the phonological and visuospatial storage systems are functionally and anatomically distinct, as well as replicated evidence supporting a single, domain-general central executive rather than separate central executive components for processing phonological and visuospatial information (Baddeley, 2007; Alloway et al., 2006; Smith et al., 1996”

    From Working memory and short-term memory deficits in ADHD: A bifactor modeling approach (2020) · cites this paper as Alloway et al., 2006

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Developmentally, there is evidence that the different components of working memory follow different trajectories of maturation, and that this divergence of developmental pathways begins relatively early.

    “Developmentally, there is evidence that the different components of working memory follow different trajectories of maturation, and that this divergence of developmental pathways begins relatively early (Alloway, Gathercole, & Pickering, 2006).”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Alloway, Gathercole, & Pickering, 2006

    The Discussion reports one difference in developmental trajectory: verbal short-term memory leveled off sooner than the other components. But it says the components’ developmental functions from ages 4 to 11 were otherwise comparable; the Descriptive Statistics section places the leveling-off at ages 10–11, not relatively early. The stronger association between components in younger children does not establish early divergence in their maturation trajectories. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working memory can be divided into verbal and visual-spatial systems, and these can be further subdivided into short-term storage/maintenance and updating/processing components.

    “Working memory can be divided based on whether it refers to verbal or visual-spatial information, and these systems can be further subdivided into short-term storage/maintenance and updating/processing components (Alloway, Gathercole, & Pickering, 2006).”

    From Inhibitory control and working memory in post-institutionalized children (2013) · cites this paper as Alloway, Gathercole, & Pickering, 2006

  • There is substantial evidence that visuo-spatial STM is not domain-specific.

    “There is substantial evidence that it is not. Across many studies employing a wide range of paradigms, it has been shown that visuo-spatial tasks show a far greater reliance on general attentional resources than their verbal equivalents (Alloway et al., 2006; Kane et al., 2004; Morey & Miron, 2016; Pearson et al., 2014; Thompson et al., 2006).”

    From Working memory training involves learning new skills (2019) · cites this paper as Alloway et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Alloway, T. P. (2006). Working memory and children with developmental coordination disorders. In T. P. Alloway & S. E. Gathercole (Eds.), Working memory and neurode- velopmental conditions (pp. 161 -187). New York: Psych- ology Press.
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central execu- tive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5 -28.
  4. Baddeley, A. D., & Lieberman, K. (1980). Spatial working memory. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and per- formance VIII (pp. 521 -539). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  5. Gathercole, S.E, & Alloway, T. P. (2006). Working memory deficits in neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 4 -15.
  6. Hanley, J. R., Young, A. W., & Pearson, N. A. (1991). Im- pairment of the visuo-spatial sketchpad. Quarterly Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 101 -125.
  7. Vandierendonck, A., Kemps, E., Fastame, M. C., & Szm- alec, A. (2004). Working memory components involved in the Corsi block test. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 57 -79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Alloway, Tracy Packiam
Venue
Child Development
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1698-1716
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2130954429
Cited by
938
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 60
FWCI
29.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
working memory, short-term memory, verbal memory, visuospatial memory, children, memory structure, domain-general processing, cognitive development, age differences
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Space Perception, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review