Cited by 2,132Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros.

Open access
Valeri, Linda, VanderWeele, Tyler J.·2013·Psychological Methods

Abstract

Mediation analysis is a useful and widely employed approach to studies in the field of psychology and in the social and biomedical sciences. The contributions of this article are several-fold. First we seek to bring the developments in mediation analysis for nonlinear models within the counterfactual framework to the psychology audience in an accessible format and compare the sorts of inferences about mediation that are possible in the presence of exposure-mediator interaction when using a counterfactual versus the standard statistical approach. Second, the work by VanderWeele and Vansteelandt (2009, 2010) is extended here to allow for dichotomous mediators and count outcomes. Third, we provide SAS and SPSS macros to implement all of these mediation analysis techniques automatically, and we compare the types of inferences about mediation that are allowed by a variety of software macros.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0031034

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Alwin DF Hauser RM 1975 The decomposition of effects in path analysis American Sociological Review 40 37 47
  2. Hafeman DM VanderWeele TJ 2011 Alternative assumptions for the identification of direct and indirect effects Epidemiology 22 753 764 20502339
  3. Hyman HH 1955 Survey design and analysis: Principles, cases and procedures Glencoe, IL Free Press
  4. Imai K Keele L Tingley D Yamamoto T 2010b Causal Mediation Analysis Using R Vinod HD Advances in Social Science Research Using R 129 154 New York Springer
  5. James LR Brett JM 1984 Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation Journal of Applied Psychology 69 307321
  6. Jo B 2008 Causal inference in randomized experiments with mediational processes Psychological Methods 13 314 336 19071997 PMC2927874
  7. Joffe M Small D Hsu C-Y 2007 Defining and estimating intervention effects for groups that will develop an auxiliary outcome Statistical Science 22 74 97 10.1214/088342306000000655. · DOI
  8. Kraemer HC Kiernan M Essex M Kupfer DJ 2008 How and why the criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur Approaches Health Psychology 27 2 Suppl S101 S108 18377151 PMC3376898
  9. MacKinnon DP Dwyer JH 1993 Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies Evaluation Review 17 144 158
  10. Pearl J 2001 Direct and Indirect Effects Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence San Francisco, CA Morgan Kaufmann 411 420 é
  11. Robins JM Green P Hjort NL Richardson S 2003 Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects Highly Structured Stochastic Systems 70 81 Oxford University Press New York
  12. Robins JM Greenland S 1992 Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects Epidemiology 3 143 155 1576220
  13. Robins JM Richardson TS 2010 Alternative graphical causal models and the identification of direct effects Causality and Psychopathology: Finding the Determinants of Disorders and Their Cures Shrout P Oxford University Press
  14. Shpitser I VanderWeele TJ 2011 A complete graphical criterion for the adjustment formula in mediation analysis International Journal of Biostatistics, 7, Article 16 1 24 PMC3083137 21556286
  15. Sobel ME 2008 Identification of causal parameters in randomized studies with mediating variables Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 33 230 251
  16. VanderWeele TJ Vansteelandt S 2010 Odds Ratios for Mediation Analysis for a Dichotomous Outcome Am J Epidemiol 172 12 1339 1348 10.1093/aje/kwq332 21036955 PMC2998205 · DOI · Paper page
  17. VanderWeele T 2011 Causal Mediation Analysis with Survival Data Epidemiology 22 575581 PMC3109321 21642779
  18. VanderWeele TJ 2012 A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects Epidemiology in press PMC3563853 23354283
  19. Yzerbyt V Muller D Judd CM 2004 Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 424 431

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valeri, L., & VanderWeele, T. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2013-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
137-150
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2005441291
Cited by
2,132
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 234 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 217 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 243 · 2019: 161 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
68.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (ES017876; HD060696)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
mediation analysis, counterfactual framework, nonlinear models, count outcomes, causal inference, SAS macro
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Psychology, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Software, User-Computer Interface, Causality, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review