The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rituals alleviate grieving for loved ones, lovers, and lotteries.
Open accessAbstract
Three experiments explored the impact of mourning rituals--after losses of loved ones, lovers, and lotteries--on mitigating grief. Participants who were directed to reflect on past rituals or who were assigned to complete novel rituals after experiencing losses reported lower levels of grief. Increased feelings of control after rituals mediated the link between use of rituals and reduced grief after losses, and the benefits of rituals accrued not only to individuals who professed a belief in rituals' effectiveness but also to those who did not. Although the specific rituals in which people engage after losses vary widely by culture and religion-and among our participants--our results suggest a common psychological mechanism underlying their effectiveness: regained feelings of control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, Norton and Gino (2014) demonstrated that individuals who performed rituals to manage their grief felt less sad, and more in control, than individuals who did not perform rituals.”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Gino, 2014
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Norton and Gino (2014) found that engaging in ritual-labeled behaviors (compared with matched behaviors referred to as random actions) led participants to feel a greater sense of personal control after incurring a major loss.”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Norton and Gino, 2014
Citations
Cites
THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF RELIGIOUS LIFE
Durkheim, É., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 10,708
A Theory of Psychological Reactance
Torrance, E. P., & Brehm, J. W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420824 · Cited by 4,757
Health outcomes of bereavement.
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61816-9 · Cited by 1,746
The psychology of religion and coping : theory, research, practice
Pargament, K. (1998) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3512468 · Cited by 1,680
Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss.
Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds, C. F., Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T., Fasiczka, A., Frank, E., Doman, J., & Miller, M. (1995) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2 · Cited by 1,582
To Do or to Have? That Is the Question.
Leaf Van Boven, A., & Gilovich, T. D. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1193 · Cited by 1,244
Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119
Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays.
Rawls, J., Malinowski, B., & Redfield, R. R. (1948) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2181808 · Cited by 1,034
Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care.
(2001) · doi:10.1037/10436-000 · Cited by 947
The Ritual Dimension of Consumer Behavior
Rook, D. W. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208514 · Cited by 843
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Science of Meaning in Life
King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-072420-122921 · Cited by 633
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354
Resolving uncertainty in a social world
FeldmanHall, O., & Shenhav, A. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0590-x · Cited by 298
Risen, J. L. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000017 · Cited by 221
RETRACTED: Don’t stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety
Brooks, A. W., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Gino, F., Galinsky, A. D., Norton, M. I., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.004 · Cited by 182
Self-citationRetracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, M. I., & Gino, F.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Norton, Michael I.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 266-272
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2129753587
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- mourning rituals, grief, loss, perceived control, bereavement, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Ceremonial Behavior, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
