CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,007Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Outcomes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement.

Mega, Carolina, Ronconi, Lucia, De Beni, Rossana·2014·Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0033546
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors propose a theoretical model linking emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation to academic achievement. This model was tested with 5,805 undergraduate students. They completed the Self-Regulated Learning, Emotions, and Motivation Computerized Battery (LEM–B) composed of 3 self-report questionnaires: the Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire (LQ), the Emotions Questionnaire (EQ), and the Motivation Questionnaire (MQ). The findings were consistent with the authors’ hypotheses and appeared to support all aspects of the proposed model. The structural equation model showed that students’ emotions influence their self-regulated learning and their motivation, and these, in turn, affect academic achievement. Thus, self-regulated learning and motivation mediate the effects of emotions on academic achievement. Moreover, positive emotions foster academic achievement only when they are mediated by self-regulated learning and motivation. The results are discussed with regard to the key role of emotions in academic settings and in terms of theoretical implications for researchers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033546

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
ORCID
Ronconi, Lucia
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2014-02
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
121-131
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
DOI
10.1037/a0033546
OpenAlex
W2144200946
Cited by
1,007
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17
FWCI
38.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
emotions, student self-regulation, motivation, academic performance, positive emotions, undergraduate students, mediation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review