The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Faith to move mountains: Religious coping, spirituality, and interpersonal trauma recovery.
Abstract
Interpersonal trauma is pervasive globally and may result in long-term consequences physically, cognitively, behaviorally, socially, and spiritually (Bryant-Davis, 2005b). One of the protective factors that have emerged in the literature is religious coping. Religious coping, spirituality, and faith-based approaches to trauma recovery include endorsement of beliefs, engagement in behaviors, and access to support from faith communities. Compared with negative religious coping, spirituality and positive religious coping have been associated with decreased psychological distress, a finding established with survivors of child abuse, sexual violence, intimate partner violence, community violence, and war. This article focuses on spiritual and religious coping among survivors of child abuse, sexual violence, and war; however, research demonstrates increased use of positive religious coping among some survivors with higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder. Much of the scholarship in this area includes qualitative studies with populations who face increased vulnerability to interpersonal trauma. Research in this area covers the life span from childhood to later adulthood and encompasses both domestic and international studies. The implications of research findings are explored, and future research needs are described. This line of research supports the American Psychological Association (2010) ethical standards that note the recognition of spiritual and religious faith traditions as important aspects of the provision of ethical treatment. Researchers, clinicians, and advocates for trauma survivors are encouraged to attend to the faith traditions and beliefs of persons confronting the potential devastation of traumatic events.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trauma survivors have identified spirituality as a source of positivity, optimism, security, and meaning (Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013; Milner et al., 2020).”
From The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: a study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. (2023) · cites this paper as Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013
In the citing paper
“In recent years, spirituality has been identified as a factor that might be related to positive outcomes (Ager et al., 2015; Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013).”
From The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: a study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. (2023) · cites this paper as Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013
In the citing paper
“Although the findings of this study are preliminary in nature and require further research to confirm, they would be in line with other studies showing benefit from spirituality as relates to well-being (Ager et al., 2015; Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013) and even spirituality as a source of support in the face of adversity (Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013; Milner et al., 2020).”
From The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: a study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. (2023) · cites this paper as Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013
In the citing paper
“To date, social relationships, financial support, social environment, access to services, peer support, personal factors, and more (Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013; Frimpong-Manso, 2018; Scott et al., 2022; Sulimani-Aidan & Melkman, 2018; van Breda & Dickens, 2017) have been shown to support better outcomes in this population.”
From The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: a study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. (2023) · cites this paper as Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013
In the citing paper
“Findings from the current study are consistent with previous research on other vulnerable populations that suggests that spirituality has a positive association on well-being (Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013; Campbell & Bauer, 2021; Park et al., 2017; Tuck & Anderson, 2014).”
From The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: a study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. (2023) · cites this paper as Bryant-Davis & Wong, 2013
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Religion and Health
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2004) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200405000-00015 · Cited by 3,262
Wang, P. S., Lane, M., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629 · Cited by 2,695
The psychology of religion and coping : theory, research, practice
Pargament, K. (1998) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3512468 · Cited by 1,680
Research on Religion, Spirituality, and Mental Health: A Review
Koenig, H. G. (2009) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370905400502 · Cited by 1,442
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.15.1881 · Cited by 759
Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/1941-1022.s.1.3 · Cited by 480
Bryant-Davis, T. S., & Ocampo, C. (2005) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000005276465 · Cited by 448
Self-citationClinical psychologists' religious and spiritual orientations and their practice of psychotherapy.
Shafranske, E. P., & Malony, H. N. (1990) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.27.1.72 · Cited by 416
The epidemiology of religious coping: a review of recent literature
Harrison, M. O., Koenig, H. G., Hays, J. C., Eme-Akwari, A. G., & Pargäment, K. I. (2001) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260120037317 · Cited by 394
Spirituality, resilience, and anger in survivors of violent trauma: A community survey
Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., & Lee, L. (2003) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/a:1025762512279 · Cited by 391
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–201 of 201
Abusafia, B., & Turan, Z. (2026) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2026.102421
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryant-Davis, T., & Wong, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Pepperdine University (US)
- RAND Corporation (US)
- ORCID
- Wong, Eunice C.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 675-684
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2070240432
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Keywords
- religious coping, spirituality, interpersonal trauma, trauma recovery, faith-based interventions, child abuse survivors, sexual violence survivors, war trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, religious communities, psychological distress, protective factors
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Culture, Ethics, Professional, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Pastoral Care, Religion and Psychology, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors, Spirituality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review