CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 201Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Faith to move mountains: Religious coping, spirituality, and interpersonal trauma recovery.

Bryant-Davis, Thema, Wong, Eunice C.·2013·American Psychologist
DOI 10.1037/a0034380
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interpersonal trauma is pervasive globally and may result in long-term consequences physically, cognitively, behaviorally, socially, and spiritually (Bryant-Davis, 2005b). One of the protective factors that have emerged in the literature is religious coping. Religious coping, spirituality, and faith-based approaches to trauma recovery include endorsement of beliefs, engagement in behaviors, and access to support from faith communities. Compared with negative religious coping, spirituality and positive religious coping have been associated with decreased psychological distress, a finding established with survivors of child abuse, sexual violence, intimate partner violence, community violence, and war. This article focuses on spiritual and religious coping among survivors of child abuse, sexual violence, and war; however, research demonstrates increased use of positive religious coping among some survivors with higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder. Much of the scholarship in this area includes qualitative studies with populations who face increased vulnerability to interpersonal trauma. Research in this area covers the life span from childhood to later adulthood and encompasses both domestic and international studies. The implications of research findings are explored, and future research needs are described. This line of research supports the American Psychological Association (2010) ethical standards that note the recognition of spiritual and religious faith traditions as important aspects of the provision of ethical treatment. Researchers, clinicians, and advocates for trauma survivors are encouraged to attend to the faith traditions and beliefs of persons confronting the potential devastation of traumatic events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034380

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bryant-Davis, T., & Wong, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Pepperdine University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
ORCID
Wong, Eunice C.
Venue
American Psychologist
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2013
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
675-684
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
DOI
10.1037/a0034380
OpenAlex
W2070240432
Cited by
201
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
religious coping, spirituality, interpersonal trauma, trauma recovery, faith-based interventions, child abuse survivors, sexual violence survivors, war trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, religious communities, psychological distress, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Culture, Ethics, Professional, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Pastoral Care, Religion and Psychology, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review