Cited by 93Social and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

A functional basis for structure-seeking: Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action.

Kay, Aaron C., Laurin, Kristin, Fitzsimons, Gráinne M., Landau, Mark J.·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

A recurring observation of experimental psychologists is that people prefer, seek out, and even selectively "see" structure in their social and natural environments. Structure-seeking has been observed across a wide range of phenomena--from the detection of patterns in random arrays to affinities for order-providing political, religious, social, and scientific worldviews--and is exacerbated under psychological threat. Why are people motivated for structure? An intriguing, but untested, explanation holds that perceiving structure, even in domains unrelated to one's current behavioral context, can facilitate willingness to take goal-directed actions. Supporting this, in 5 studies, reminders of structure in nature or society increase willingness to engage in goal pursuit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034462

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different runs of GPT-3.5 gave human-like answers when asked about their long-term goal in the Kay et al. (2014) survey.

    “To illustrate, in the survey of Kay et al. (2014) on whether structure promotes goal pursuit, different runs of GPT-3.5 gave human-like answers when asked about their long-term goal.”

    From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Kay et al. (2014)

  • For the Kay et al. (2014) study, the GPT sample successfully replicated the Many Labs 2 result but did not replicate the original result.

    “For the study of Kay et al. (2014), our GPT sample successfully replicated the Many Labs 2 result but did not replicate the original result.”

    From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Kay et al. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2014
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
486-491
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2312380053
Cited by
93
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
pattern perception, goal pursuit, psychological threat
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Perception, Comprehension, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review