Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.
Open accessAbstract
Can you predict what people are going to do just by watching them? This is certainly difficult: it would require a clear mapping between observable indicators and unobservable cognitive states. In this report, we demonstrate how this is possible by monitoring eye gaze and pupil dilation, which predict dissociable biases during decision making. We quantified decision making using the drift diffusion model (DDM), which provides an algorithmic account of how evidence accumulation and response caution contribute to decisions through separate latent parameters of drift rate and decision threshold, respectively. We used a hierarchical Bayesian estimation approach to assess the single trial influence of observable physiological signals on these latent DDM parameters. Increased eye gaze dwell time specifically predicted an increased drift rate toward the fixated option, irrespective of the value of the option. In contrast, greater pupil dilation specifically predicted an increase in decision threshold during difficult decisions. These findings suggest that eye tracking and pupillometry reflect the operations of dissociated latent decision processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eye tracking and pupillometry have been used to gauge the attentional, cognitive, and emotional state of a user.
“Beyond user reliance, eye tracking and pupillometry have been used to gauge the attentional, cognitive, and emotional state of a user [12,18]; for instance, pupil diameter, eyelid closure, and gaze entropy [71] are highly correlated with a person's cognitive load [84].”
From Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-Making (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371 · see citing works
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006 · see citing works
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513 · see citing works
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482 · see citing works
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764 · see citing works
Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour
Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J., & Vogt, B. A. (1995) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/118.1.279 · Cited by 3,377 · see citing works
Personality: A Psychological Interpretation
Jenkins, J. G., & Allport, G. W. (1938) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415717 · Cited by 3,215 · see citing works
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059 · see citing works
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152 · see citing works
The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex
Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2994 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
By Carrot or by Stick: Cognitive Reinforcement Learning in Parkinsonism
Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102941 · Cited by 1,964 · see citing works
Self-citationBogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P. J., & Cohen, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.700 · Cited by 1,845 · see citing works
Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory
Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.154.3756.1583 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2635 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation
Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Medication in Parkinsonism
Frank, M. J., Samanta, J., Moustafa, A. A., & Sherman, S. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1146157 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox
Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. C. (2002) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195489 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python
Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00014 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Self-citationAron, A. R., Behrens, T. E., Smith, S., Frank, M. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0519-07.2007 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Self-citationGaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1150 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious?
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611427305 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.132.3423.349 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans
O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., & Kelly, S. P. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3248 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Krajbich, I. M., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101328108 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems
Nassar, M. R., Rumsey, K. M., Wilson, R. C., Parikh, K., Heasly, B., & Gold, J. I. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3130 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Hold your horses: a dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making
Frank, M. J. (2006) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.006 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Self-citationBeatty, J. T., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000) · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold
Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Cohen, M. X., Figueroa, C. M., Samanta, J., Sherman, S. J., & Frank, M. J. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2925 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Self-citationHandbook of psychophysiology, 2nd ed.
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2000) · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Pupil dilation signals surprise: evidence for noradrenaline’s role in decision making
Preuschoff, K. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00115 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.5.798 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response
Critchley, H. D., Tang, J., Glaser, D., Butterworth, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.047 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Error-Related Negativity Predicts Reinforcement Learning and Conflict Biases
Frank, M. J., Woroch, B. S., & Curran, T. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.020 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Self-citationBiasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention
Armel, K. C., Beaumel, A., & Rangel, A. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000413 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
The effects of neural gain on attention and learning
Eldar, E., Cohen, J. D., & Niv, Y. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3428 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice
Hare, T. A., Schultz, W., Camerer, C. F., O’Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109322108 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making
Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schäfer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S. D., Wagenmakers, E., Bogacz, R., & Turner, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004932107 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions
Krajbich, I. M., Lu, D., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810002106 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationLim, S.-L., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1246-11.2011 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution
Wierda, S. M., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N., & Martens, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201858109 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Siegle, G. J., Ichikawa, N., & Steinhauer, S. R. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00681.x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Psychological significance of pupillary movements.
Goldwater, B. C. (1972) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0032456 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
The Dynamics of Decision Making in Risky Choice: An Eye-Tracking Analysis
Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Ratcliff, R., & Frank, M. J. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00270 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationDonkin, C., Brown, S. D., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after Loftus
Wagenmakers, E., Krypotos, A., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Pupil diameter measurement errors as a function of gaze direction in corneal reflection eyetrackers
Brisson, J., Mainville, M., Mailloux, D., Beaulieu, C., Serres, J., & Sirois, S. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0327-0 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction
Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Pupillary Dilations in Movement Preparation and Execution
Richer, F., & Beatty, J. (1985) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01587.x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Pupil dilation in the Simon task as a marker of conflict processing
van Steenbergen, H., & Band, G. P. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00215 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Decision Threshold Modulation in the Human Brain
Domenech, P., & Dreher, J. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2371-10.2010 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Larger Error Signals in Major Depression are Associated with Better Avoidance Learning
Cavanagh, J. F., Bismark, A. J., Frank, M. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00331 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting Preference From Fixations
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2007) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e527342012-455 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Wang, J. T., Spezio, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Schotter, E. R., Gerety, C., & Rayner, K. (2012) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.735719 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ratcliff R McKoon G The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks Neural computation 2008b 20 4 873 922 doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 18085991 PMC2474742 · DOI · Paper page
- Wiecki Thomas V Sofer I Frank MJ HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2013 7 August 1 10 doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00014 23935581 PMC3731670 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630 · see citing works
“Relationships have been established between diffusion model analyses and behavioral measures such as eye tracking [128,137] and pupil dilation [142].”
BackgroundTen simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. E. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49547 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Best practices in eye tracking research
Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias
Urai, A. E., Braun, A., & Donner, T. H. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14637 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years.
van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. A. J., & Depaoli, S. A. (2017) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000100 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Sirois, S., & Brisson, J. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1323 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work
Westbrook, A., van den Bosch, R., Määttä, J. I., Hofmans, L., Papadopetraki, D., Cools, R., & Frank, M. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz5891 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Self-citationRethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference
Krajbich, I. M., Bartling, B., Hare, T. A., & Fehr, E. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8455 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Winn, M. B., Wendt, D., Koelewijn, T., & Kuchinsky, S. E. (2018) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216518800869 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning
Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationfMRI and EEG Predictors of Dynamic Decision Parameters during Human Reinforcement Learning
Frank, M. J., Gagne, C., Nyhus, E., Masters, S. E., Wiecki, T. V., Cavanagh, J. F., & Badre, D. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2036-14.2015 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Self-citationGaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618810521 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Pupil-Linked Arousal Determines Variability in Perceptual Decision Making
Murphy, P. R., Vandekerckhove, J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003854 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions
Fontanesi, L., Gluth, S., Spektor, M. S., & Rieskamp, J. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1554-2 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives
Gluth, S., Kern, N., Kortmann, M., & Vitali, C. L. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making
Krajbich, I. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score
Winn, M. B., & Teece, K. H. (2021) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/23312165211027688 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Bell, L., Vogt, J., Willemse, C., Routledge, T., Butler, L. T., & Sakaki, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01655 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling
Callaway, F., Rangel, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making
Gluth, S., Spektor, M. S., & Rieskamp, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39659 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value
Sepulveda, P., Usher, M., Davies, N., Benson, A. A., Ortoleva, P., & De Martino, B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.60705 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Attention and choice across domains.
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000482 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Choice variability and suboptimality in uncertain environments
Wyart, V., & Koechlin, É. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.07.003 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Eye pupil signals information gain
Zénon, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1593 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience
Collins, A. G. E., & Shenhav, A. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01126-y · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Improving Out-of-Sample Predictions Using Response Times and a Model of the Decision ProcessPreprint
Clithero, J. A. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.007 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
How prior preferences determine decision-making frames and biases in the human brain
Lopez‐Persem, A., Domenech, P., & Pessiglione, M. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20317 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour
Thomas, A. W., Molter, F., Krajbich, I. M., Heekeren, H. R., & Mohr, P. N. C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Pupil size variations correlate with physical effort perception
Zénon, A., Sidibé, M., & Olivier, E. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00286 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Relating Pupil Dilation and Metacognitive Confidence during Auditory Decision-Making
Lempert, K. M., Chen, Y. L., & Fleming, S. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126588 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
How pupil responses track value-based decision-making during and after reinforcement learning
Slooten, J. C. V., Jahfari, S., Knapen, T. H. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006632 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Kim, N., Kim, J., & Ahn, C. R. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2021.101359 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Konovalov, A., & Krajbich, I. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12438 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Response Times in Economics: Looking Through the Lens of Sequential Sampling Models
Clithero, J. A. (2016) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.09.008 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
O’Callaghan, C., Hall, J. M., Tomassini, A., Muller, A. J., Walpola, I. C., Moustafa, A. A., Shine, J. M., & Lewis, S. J. G. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.04.007 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Taming the beast: extracting generalizable knowledge from computational models of cognition
Nassar, M. R., & Frank, M. J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.003 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior
Jang, A. I., Sharma, R., & Drugowitsch, J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.63436 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Visual attention in multi-attributes choices: What can eye-tracking tell us?
Krucien, N., Ryan, M., & Hermens, F. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.018 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Learning and Generalizing Hierarchical Rules in 8-Month-Old Infants
Werchan, D. M., Collins, A. G. E., Frank, M. J., & Amso, D. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1351-16.2016 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationGredin, N. V., Bishop, D. T., Broadbent, D. P., Tucker, A., & Williams, A. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000174 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review
Wedel, M., Pieters, R. G. M., & van der Lans, R. (2022) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-022-09876-4 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-Making
Cao, S., & Huang, C.-M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555572 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Healthful choices depend on the latency and rate of information accumulation
Sullivan, N., & Huettel, S. A. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01154-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Pedersen, M. L., & Frank, M. J. (2020) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-020-00084-w · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationChoice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?
Uggeldahl, K. C., Jacobsen, C., Lundhede, T., & Olsen, S. B. (2016) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.09.002 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Value-Based Choice, Contingency Learning, and Suicidal Behavior in Mid- and Late-Life Depression
Dombrovski, A. Y., Hallquist, M. N., Brown, V. M., Wilson, J., & Szanto, K. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.10.006 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Eye Movements as a Window into Decision-Making
Spering, M. (2022) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-100720-125029 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The effect of atomoxetine on random and directed exploration in humans
Warren, C. M., Wilson, R. C., van der Wee, N. J., Giltay, E. J., van Noorden, M. S., Cohen, J. D., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176034 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Lin, H., Saunders, B., Hutcherson, C. A. C., & Inzlicht, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.055 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Decomposing loss aversion from gaze allocation and pupil dilation
Feng, S., Ramakrishnan, A., Seok, D., Zhao, W. J., Thelaus, S., Cen, P., & Platt, M. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919670117 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Fontanesi, L., Palminteri, S., & Lebreton, M. P. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00723-1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The emotive nature of conflict monitoring in the medial prefrontal cortex
Saunders, B., Lin, H., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.01.004 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The spillover effects of attentional learning on value-based choice
Gwinn, R., Leber, A. B., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.012 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice
Cherkasova, M. V., Clark, L., Barton, J. J. S., Schulzer, M., Shafiee, M., Kingstone, A. F., Stoessl, A. J., & Winstanley, C. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1171-18.2018 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Auditory information enhances post-sensory visual evidence during rapid multisensory decision-making
Franzen, L., Delis, I., De Sousa, G., Kayser, C., & Philiastides, M. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19306-7 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Irrational time allocation in decision-making
Oud, B., Krajbich, I. M., Miller, K. J., Cheong, J. H., Botvinick, M., & Fehr, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1439 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Applications and Innovations of Eye‐movement Research in Judgment and Decision Making
Ashby, N. J. S., Johnson, J. G., Krajbich, I. M., & Wedel, M. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1956 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Computational modeling of epiphany learning
Chen, W. J., & Krajbich, I. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618161114 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity
Shevlin, B. R. K., Smith, S. M., Hausfeld, J., & Krajbich, I. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101508119 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Frömer, R., & Shenhav, A. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.006 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A Computational Cognitive Biomarker for Early-Stage Huntington’s Disease
Wiecki, T. V., Antoniades, C. A., Stevenson, A. D., Christopher Kennard, C., Borowsky, B., Owen, G. N., Leavitt, B. R., Roos, R. A. C., Dürr, A., Tabrizi, S. J., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148409 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationSpektor, M. S., Gluth, S., Fontanesi, L., & Rieskamp, J. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000122 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Aberrant decision-making and drug addiction — how strong is the evidence?
Ekhtiari, H., Victor, T. A., & Paulus, M. P. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.002 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Error-related pupil dilation is sensitive to the evaluation of different error types
Maier, M. E., Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. (2018) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.12.013 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A multiattribute attentional drift diffusion model
Fisher, G. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.04.004 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice
Ahn, W., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.001 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Attentional economics links value-modulated attentional capture and decision-making
Pearson, D., Watson, P., Albertella, L., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00053-z · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Dopamine Promotes Cognitive Effort by Biasing the Benefits Versus Costs of Cognitive WorkPreprint
Westbrook, A., van den Bosch, R., Määttä, J. I., Hofmans, L., Papadopetraki, D., Cools, R., & Frank, M. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/778134 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationCubillo, A., Hermes, H., Berger, E., Winkel, K., Schunk, D., Fehr, E., & Hare, T. A. (2022) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13252 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice
Thomas, A. W., Molter, F., & Krajbich, I. M. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57012 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Attention bias modification in drug addiction: Enhancing control of subsequent habits
Parvaz, M., Malaker, P., Zilverstand, A., Moeller, S. J., Alia-Klein, N., & Goldstein, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2012941118 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Goals, usefulness and abstraction in value-based choice
Martino, B. D., & Cortese, A. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.001 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Emotional arousal and discount rate in intertemporal choice are reference dependent.
Lempert, K. M., Glimcher, P. W., & Phelps, E. A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000047 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Cost-benefit trade-offs in decision-making and learning
Sidarus, N., Palminteri, S., & Chambon, V. (2019) · PLoS Comput. Biol. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007326 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
Strauch, C., Koniakowsky, I. M., & Huckauf, A. (2020) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.96 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Regulation of evidence accumulation by pupil-linked arousal processes
Keung, W., Hagen, T. A., & Wilson, R. C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0551-4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Slower speaking rate reduces listening effort among listeners with cochlear implants
Winn, M., & Teece, K. H. (2020) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000958 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation
Stojić, H., Orquin, J. L., Dayan, P., Dolan, R., & Speekenbrink, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911348117 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Identifying Uncertainty States during Wayfinding in Indoor Environments: An EEG Classification Study
Zhu, B., Cruz-Garza, J. G., Yang, Q., Shoaran, M., & Kalantari, S. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2022.101718 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
How can neuroscience inform economics?
Krajbich, I. M., & Dean, M. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.07.005 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Long-term stress and trait anxiety affect brain network balance in dynamic cognitive computations
Liu, L., Wu, J., Geng, H., Liu, C., Luo, Y., Luo, J., & Qin, S. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab393 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning in males
Chakroun, K., Wiehler, A., Wagner, B., Mathar, D., Ganzer, F., van Eimeren, T., Sommer, T., & Peters, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41130-y · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls
van den Bos, W., Bruckner, R., Nassar, M. R., Mata, R., & Eppinger, B. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
An uncertainty-based model of the effects of fixation on choice
Li, Z., & Ma, W. J. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009190 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Reconsidering the path for neural and physiological methods in consumer psychology
Clithero, J. A., Karmarkar, U. R., Nave, G., & Plaßmann, H. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1397 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gwinn, R., & Krajbich, I. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103892 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Loss Aversion Reflects Information Accumulation, Not Bias: A Drift-Diffusion Model Study
Clay, S. N., Clithero, J. A., Harris, A. M., & Reed, C. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01708 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Delis, I., Dmochowski, J., Sajda, P., & Wang, Q. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.035 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jahfari, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Collins, A. G. E., Knapen, T. H. J., Waldorp, L., & Frank, M. J. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy076 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of visual attention on memory-based preferential choice
Weilbächer, R. A., Krajbich, I. M., Rieskamp, J., & Gluth, S. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104804 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Zaman, J., Madden, V. J., Iven, J., Wiech, K., Weltens, N., Ly, H. G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Oudenhove, L. V., & Diest, I. V. (2017) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.04.011 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Schwalm, M., & Jubal, E. R. (2017) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0293-16.2017 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Food decision-making under time pressure
Huseynov, S., & Palma, M. A. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104072 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Shocking secret you won’t believe! Emotional arousal in clickbait headlines
Pengnate, S. F. (2019) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2018-0172 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Pre-stimulus pupil dilation and the preparatory control of attention
Irons, J. L., Jeon, M., & Leber, A. B. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188787 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Rahal, R.-M., Fiedler, S., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64592-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cavanagh, S. E., Malalasekera, W. M. N., Miranda, B., Hunt, L. T., & Kennerley, S. W. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906662116 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Jerit, J., & Kam, C. D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.14 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Modeling Eye Movements and Response Times in Consumer Choice
Krajbich, I. M., & Smith, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization · doi:10.1515/jafio-2015-0016 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Hoffing, R. C., Lauharatanahirun, N., Forster, D. E., Garcia, J. O., Vettel, J. M., & Thurman, S. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230517 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Kochar, A., & Frank, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1476-1488
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- PMC
- PMC4114997
- OpenAlex
- W2132578666
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5T32MH019118-21 and RO1 MH080066-01)
- National Science Foundation (1125788)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- eye tracking, pupillometry, decision-making, drift-diffusion model, drift rate, decision threshold, response caution, evidence accumulation, pupil dilation, hierarchical Bayesian estimation
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Computer Simulation, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Pupil, Eye Movement Measurements, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review