Cited by 722Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems

Open access
Nassar, Matthew R, Rumsey, Katherine M, Wilson, Robert C, Parikh, Kinjan, Heasly, Benjamin, Gold, Joshua I·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability to make inferences about the current state of a dynamic process requires ongoing assessments of the stability and reliability of data generated by that process. We found that these assessments, as defined by a normative model, were reflected in nonluminance-mediated changes in pupil diameter of human subjects performing a predictive-inference task. Brief changes in pupil diameter reflected assessed instabilities in a process that generated noisy data. Baseline pupil diameter reflected the reliability with which recent data indicate the current state of the data-generating process and individual differences in expectations about the rate of instabilities. Together these pupil metrics predicted the influence of new data on subsequent inferences. Moreover, a task- and luminance-independent manipulation of pupil diameter predictably altered the influence of new data. Thus, pupil-linked arousal systems can help to regulate the influence of incoming data on existing beliefs in a dynamic environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3130

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deviations from expected uncertainty should increase learning rates.

    “Here, deviations from expected uncertainty (“unexpected uncertainty”) should increase learning rates.8,12,13,15–18”

    From Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

  • When some amount of uncertainty is expected, learning rates should decrease.

    “When some amount of uncertainty is expected (also referred to as outcome variance or risk), learning rates should decrease.10–14”

    From Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

  • The learning rate β depends on global task properties such as volatility or uncertainty and is suggested to be modulated by noradrenergic inputs.

    “This rate depends on global task properties such as the volatility or uncertainty of a given task, and has been suggested to be modulated by noradrenergic inputs (Cohen et al., 2007; Nassar et al., 2012).”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Nassar et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Schmidt HS Fortin LD Fortin LD Schmidt HS Guilleminault Electronic pupillography in disorders of arousal Sleeping and waking disorders: Indication and technique 1982 Menlo Park, CA Addison–Wesley 127 143
  2. [22]Behrens TE Woolrich MW Walton ME Rushworth MF Learning the value of information in an uncertain world Nat. Neurosci 2007 10 1214 1221 17676057

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nassar, M. R., Rumsey, K. M., Wilson, R. C., Parikh, K., Heasly, B., & Gold, J. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Gold, Joshua I
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-06-03
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1040-1046
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2008497075
Cited by
722
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 4
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH093099, R21MH093904)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T90 DA22763, T90DA022763)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY015260)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
pupil size, belief updating, predictive inference, learning dynamics, data reliability assessment, normative model, noisy data, Bayesian inference
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Pupil, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review