Cited by 101Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersMemory Processes and Influences

Evidence for the preferential incorporation of emotional waking-life experiences into dreams.

Open access
Malinowski, Josie, Horton, Caroline L.·2014·Dreaming

Abstract

The continuity hypothesis of dreaming states that waking life is continuous with\ndreams, but many of the factors that have been postulated to influence wake–dream\ncontinuity have rarely been studied. The present study investigated whether certain\nfactors—emotional and stressfulness intensity, and certain types of experiences—\ninfluence the likelihood of a waking-life experience being incorporated into a dream.\nParticipants (N � 32) kept dream diaries and waking-life experience logs for 14\nconsecutive days, and waking-life experiences were matched to dream reports.\nWaking-life experiences that were incorporated into dreams were significantly more\nemotional, but no more stressful, than those that were not incorporated into dreams.\nMajor daily activities were incorporated significantly less than the combination of\npersonally significant experiences, major concerns, and novel experiences. Results are\ndiscussed in terms of dream functionality, particularly in relation to a postulated\nemotional memory assimilation theory of dream function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036017

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Waking-life experiences that are incorporated into dreams are more emotionally intense than those that are not incorporated.

    “waking-life experiences that are incorporated into dreams are more emotionally intense than those that are not incorporated (Schredl, 2006; Malinowski and Horton, 2014)”
  • Emotional and personally significant experiences are preferentially incorporated into dreams.

    “emotional and personally significant experiences are preferentially incorporated (Cartwright et al., 1998b, 2006; Schredl, 2006; Propper et al., 2007; Malinowski and Horton, 2014)”
  • Dream contents from REM sleep have a higher probability to include incorporated waking-life experiences, especially when related to salient emotional events.

    “Dream contents from REM sleep showed a higher probability to include incorporated waking-life experiences (Schredl, 2006; Malinowski and Horton, 2014; Eichenlaub et al., 2018), especially when related to salient emotional events (Voss and Klimke, 2018).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Malinowski and Horton, 2014

  • Emotional intensity is higher for daytime experiences that are incorporated into dreams, relative to those which do not appear in dreams.

    “In support of this view, emotional intensity is reportedly higher for daytime experiences that are incorporated into dreams, relative to those which do not appear in dreams [32, 33].”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

  • Dreams incorporate fragments of episodic memory in a non-random fashion, perhaps preferentially including episodic memory content of special significance or salience to the dreamer.

    “Together, these observations suggest that dreams incorporate fragments of episodic memory in a non-random fashion, perhaps preferentially including episodic memory content of special significance or salience to the dreamer.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cartwright, R. (2011). The twenty-four hour mind: The role and sleep and dreaming in our emotional lives . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malinowski, J., & Horton, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bedfordshire (GB)
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Corresponding author
Horton, Caroline L.
Venue
Dreaming
Published
2014-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
18-31
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2324641198
Cited by
101
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Dreaming (publishedVersion)
  • BGRO - Business, Governance and Religious Organisations Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
stress, dream function, novel experience, dream diary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review