Cited by 109Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

A randomized controlled trial evaluating a brief parenting program with children with autism spectrum disorders

Tellegen, Cassandra L., Sanders, Matthew R.·2014·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of Primary Care Stepping Stones Triple P, a brief individualized parenting program, in a sample of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: Sixty-four parents of children aged 2-9 years (M = 5.67, SD = 2.14) with an ASD diagnosis participated in the study. Eighty-six percent of children were male, and 89% of parents identified their child's ethnicity as Australian/White. Families were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 conditions (intervention or care-as-usual) and were assessed at 3 time points (preintervention, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up). Parents completed a range of questionnaires to assess changes in child behavior (Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory) and parent outcomes (Parenting Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, Parent Problem Checklist, Relationship Quality Inventory, Parental Stress Scale) and 30-min home observations of parent-child interactions. RESULTS: Relative to the care-as-usual group, significant short-term improvements were found in the intervention group on parent-reported child behavior problems, dysfunctional parenting styles, parenting confidence, and parental stress, parental conflict, and relationship happiness. No significant intervention effects were found on levels of parental depression or anxiety, or on observed child disruptive and parent aversive behavior. The effect sizes for significant variables ranged from medium to large. Short-term effects were predominantly maintained at 6-month follow-up, and parents reported high levels of goal achievement and satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a brief low intensity version of Stepping Stones Triple P is an efficacious intervention for parents of children with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037246

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tellegen, C. L., & Sanders, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2014-12
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1193-1200
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2157608096
Cited by
109
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parenting support, Stepping Stones Triple P, child behavior problems, dysfunctional parenting, parental stress, parental confidence, parent-child interaction, parent-child relationship, early childhood
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Anxiety, Australia, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parenting, Treatment Outcome, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review