The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4).
Open accessAbstract
The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) and its earlier versions are measures designed to assess societal and interpersonal aspects of appearance ideals. Correlational, structural equation modeling, and prospective studies of the SATAQ-3 have shown consistent and significant associations with measures of body image disturbance and eating pathology. In the current investigation, the SATAQ-3 was revised to improve upon some conceptual limitations and was evaluated in 4 U.S. and 3 international female samples, as well as a U.S. male sample. In Study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for a sample of women from the Southeastern United States (N = 859) indicated a 22-item scale with 5 factors: Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat, Internalization: Muscular/Athletic, Pressures: Family, Pressures: Media, Pressures: Peers. This scale structure was confirmed in 3 independent and geographically diverse samples of women from the United States (East Coast N = 440, West Coast N = 304, and North/Midwest N = 349). SATAQ-4 scale scores demonstrated excellent reliability and good convergent validity with measures of body image, eating disturbance, and self-esteem. Study 2 replicated the factorial validity, reliability, and convergent validity of the SATAQ-4 in an international sample of women drawn from Italy, England, and Australia (N = 362). Study 3 examined a sample of college males from the United States (N = 271); the 5-factor solution was largely replicated, yet there was some evidence of an underlying structure unique to men. Future research avenues include additional item testing and modification of the scale for men, as well as adaptation of the measure for children and adolescents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.
Thompson, B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10694-000 · Cited by 3,469
Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance.
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999) · doi:10.1037/10312-000 · Cited by 3,100 · cited 2×
“Internalization refers to the degree to which an individual “buys into” socially-prescribed appearance ideals, expresses a desire to attain the appearance ideal, and engages in behaviors aimed at meeting those ideals (Thompson et al., 1999; Thompson & Stice, 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSome necessary conditions for common-factor analysis
Guttman, L. (1954) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289162 · Cited by 1,689
Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8 · Cited by 1,630
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,539 · cited 1×
“…& Smith, 2010; Harris & Carr, 2001; Heatherton, Mahamedi, Striepe, Field, & Keel, 1997; Jones, Bennett, Olmsted, Lawson, & Rodin, 2001; Polivy & Herman, 1985), each sample in the current investigation was limited to individuals between the ages of 18 and 30 in order to maintain…”
BackgroundAn exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls
McCreary, D. R., & Sasse, D. K. (2000) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448480009596271 · Cited by 1,184
Relation Between Dieting and Weight Change Among Preadolescents and Adolescents
Field, A. E., Austin, S. B., Taylor, C. B., Malspeis, S., Rosner, B., Rockett, H. R., Gillman, M. W., & Colditz, G. A. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.4.900 · Cited by 631
Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Joiner, T., Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. E., Bardone‐Cone, A. M., Klein, M., & le Grange, D. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20373 · Cited by 425
Self-citationShroff, H., & Thompson, J. K. (2006) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.10.004 · Cited by 403
Self-citationPsychosocial risk factors for eating disorders
Keel, P. K., & Forney, K. J. (2013) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22094 · Cited by 390
College men’s perceptions of ideal body composition and shape
Ridgeway, R. T., & Tylka, T. L. (2005) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.209 · Cited by 288
Personal, Behavioral, and Environmental Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent Overweight
Haines, J., Neumark‐Sztainer, D., Wall, M., & Story, M. (2007) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.327 · Cited by 156
The drive for muscularity scale: description, psychometrics, and research findings
McCreary, D. R. (2008) · The muscular ideal: Psychological, social, and medical perspectives. · doi:10.1037/11581-004 · Cited by 150
Brown, F. L., & Slaughter, V. (2011) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.02.002 · Cited by 60
Cited by
A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance
Saiphoo, A. N., & Vahedi, Z. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028 · Cited by 539
McLean, S. A., Paxton, S. J., Wertheim, E. H., & Masters, J. (2015) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22449 · Cited by 428
Self-citationRodgers, R. F., Slater, A., Gordon, C. S., McLean, S. A., Jarman, H. K., & Paxton, S. J. (2020) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01190-0 · Cited by 296
Self-citationMingoia, J., Hutchinson, A. D., Wilson, C., & Gleaves, D. H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01351 · Cited by 253
“…13.13 Correlational AUS Engagement with SNSs Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-4: Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat subscale (Schaefer et al., 2015) Appearance-related features 0.24 Meier and Gray, 2014 Overall use 103 0.12 15.40 Correlational USA Time per day using defined…”
MethodInfluentialRobinson, L., Prichard, I., Nikolaidis, A., Drummond, C., Drummond, M., & Tiggemann, M. (2017) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.06.001 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., Thompson, J. K., Dedrick, R. F., Heinberg, L. J., Calogero, R. M., Bardone-Cone, A. M., Higgins, M. K., Frederick, D. A., Kelly, M., Anderson, D. A., Schaumberg, K., Nerini, A., Stefanile, C., Dittmar, H., Clark, E., Adams, Z., Macwana, S., Klump, K. L., Vercellone, A. C., Paxton, S. J., & Swami, V.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-67
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2946853908
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
