The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias.
Open accessAbstract
Although performance on laboratory-based implicit bias tasks often is interpreted strictly in terms of the strength of automatic associations, recent evidence suggests that such tasks are influenced by higher-order cognitive control processes, so-called executive functions (EFs). However, extant work in this area has been limited by failure to account for the unity and diversity of EFs, focus on only a single measure of bias and/or EF, and relatively small sample sizes. The current study sought to comprehensively model the relation between individual differences in EFs and the expression of racial bias in 3 commonly used laboratory measures. Participants (N = 485) completed a battery of EF tasks (Session 1) and 3 racial bias tasks (Session 2), along with numerous individual difference questionnaires. The main findings were as follows: (a) measures of implicit bias were only weakly intercorrelated; (b) EF and estimates of automatic processes both predicted implicit bias and also interacted, such that the relation between automatic processes and bias expression was reduced at higher levels of EF; (c) specific facets of EF were differentially associated with overall task performance and controlled processing estimates across different bias tasks; (d) EF did not moderate associations between implicit and explicit measures of bias; and (e) external, but not internal, motivation to control prejudice depended on EF to reduce bias expression. Findings are discussed in terms of the importance of global and specific EF abilities in determining expression of implicit racial bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When a higher-order common factor is used to model the correlations among response inhibition, working memory updating, and mental set shifting (see Fig. 3b), that common factor almost perfectly predicts the inhibition factor [37, 38, 157, 158], but there is significant variance in the updating and shifting factors that is not related to the common factor.”
From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, when the correlated factors model is re-parameterized into a bifactor model (see Fig. 3c), there are updating-specific and shifting-specific factors, but there is no evidence for a response inhibition-specific factor [37, 38, 157].”
From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Since that initial study, this psychometric latent variable approach has been used in a large number of studies to show that unity and diversity of CC is evident across samples and ages (e.g., [34–41]), although there are some studies that suggest more unity (higher correlations between factors) in early childhood [35, 42–44].”
From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Self-citationHu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“…associations that people were increasingly unwilling (or unable) to report, thereby circumventing well documented limitations inthe willingness and ability to accurately introspect on the cognitive processes that produce overt behaviors (Kunda, 1990; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Zajonc, 1980).”
BackgroundMeasuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Cohen J Cohen P 1984 Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2 Psychology Press
- Satorra A Bentler PM 2010 Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic Psychometrika 75 243 248 20640194 PMC2905175
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023 · Cited by 1,834
Self-citationThe role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function
Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0 · Cited by 1,737
“3c), there are updating-specific and shifting-specific factors, but there is no evidence for a response inhibition-specific factor [37, 38, 157].”
BackgroundSelf-citationKarr, J. E., Areshenkoff, C. N., Rast, P., Hofer, S. M., Iverson, G. L., & Garcia-Barrera, M. A. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000160 · Cited by 637
A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks
Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y · Cited by 321
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Altamirano, L. J., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Rhea, S. A., & Hewitt, J. K. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000075 · Cited by 294
Self-citationGreenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837 · Cited by 364
Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320911325 · Cited by 206
Amodio, D. M., Bartholow, B. D., & Ito, T. A. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst177 · Cited by 160
Self-citationImplicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem
Greenwald, A. G., Dasgupta, N., Dovidio, J. F., Kang, J., Moss‐Racusin, C. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2022) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/15291006211070781 · Cited by 176
Meißner, F., Grigutsch, L. A., Koranyi, N., Müller, F., & Rothermund, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02483 · Cited by 155
Snyder, H. R., Friedman, N. P., & Hankin, B. L. (2019) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-019-10016-z · Cited by 121
Self-citationUnity and diversity of executive functions in creativity
Zabelina, D. L., Friedman, N. P., & Andrews‐Hanna, J. R. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005 · Cited by 128
Self-citationApplying processing trees in social psychology
Hütter, M., & Klauer, K. C. (2016) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1212966 · Cited by 113
von Bastian, C. C., Blais, C., Brewer, G. A., Gyurkovics, M., Hedge, C., Kałamała, P., Meier, M. E., Oberauer, K., Rey-Mermet, A., Rouder, J. N., et al. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/x3b9k · Cited by 116
Self-citationVolpert‐Esmond, H. I., Merkle, E. C., Levsen, M. P., Ito, T. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13044 · Cited by 112
Self-citationGustavson, D. E., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000110 · Cited by 120
Self-citationSnyder, H. R., Friedman, N. P., & Hankin, B. L. (2021) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191120965694 · Cited by 94
Self-citationWhy Most Studies of Individual Differences With Inhibition Tasks Are Bound To FailPreprint
Rouder, J. N., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5 · Cited by 89
Executive functions and substance use: Relations in late adolescence and early adulthood.
Gustavson, D. E., Stallings, M. C., Corley, R. P., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000250 · Cited by 84
Self-citationThe Multiverse of Methods: Extending the Multiverse Analysis to Address Data-Collection Decisions
Harder, J. A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620917678 · Cited by 87
Gustavson, D. E., Panizzon, M. S., Franz, C. E., Reynolds, C. A., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., Lyons, M. J., Kremen, W. S., & Friedman, N. P. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000589 · Cited by 75
Self-citationIndividual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach
Okada, B. M., & Slevc, L. R. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0822-8 · Cited by 84
Holfelder, B., Klotzbier, T. J., Eisele, M., & Schott, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00694 · Cited by 87
Cognitive Flexibility and Pro–Environmental Behaviour: A Multimethod Approach
Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2204 · Cited by 75
Friedman, N. P., Hatoum, A. S., Gustavson, D. E., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., & Young, S. E. (2020) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619898814 · Cited by 66
Self-citationQian, M. K., Quinn, P. C., Heyman, G. D., Pascalis, O., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12971 · Cited by 72
Executive Function in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analysis of fMRI Studies
Zhang, Z., Peng, P., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04461-z · Cited by 65
The Implicit Association Test at age 20: What is known and what is not known about implicit biasPreprint
Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, C. M., Cai, H., Cvencek, D., Dovidio, J. F., Friese, M., Hahn, A., Hehman, E., Hofmann, W., Hughes, S., et al. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bf97c · Cited by 64
Himi, S. A., Bühner, M., Schwaighofer, M., Klapetek, A., & Hilbert, S. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.010 · Cited by 66
Genetic and environmental architecture of executive functions in midlife.
Gustavson, D. E., Panizzon, M. S., Franz, C. E., Friedman, N. P., Reynolds, C. A., Jacobson, K. C., Xian, H., Lyons, M. J., & Kremen, W. S. (2018) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000389 · Cited by 53
Self-citationZhang, Z., Peng, P., Eickhoff, S. B., Lin, X., Zhang, D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13111 · Cited by 52
The empathy impulse: A multinomial model of intentional and unintentional empathy for pain.
Cameron, C. D., Spring, V. L., & Todd, A. R. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000266 · Cited by 52
Rumination and executive functions: Understanding cognitive vulnerability for psychopathology
du Pont, A., Rhee, S. H., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.026 · Cited by 54
Self-citationThe common factor of executive functions measures nothing but speed of information uptake
Löffler, C., Frischkorn, G. T., Hagemann, D., Sadus, K., & Schubert, A. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01924-7 · Cited by 69
Dissociating processes underlying level-1 visual perspective taking in adults
Todd, A. R., Cameron, C. D., & Simpson, A. J. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.010 · Cited by 52
Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System
Karr, J. E., Hofer, S. M., Iverson, G. L., & García-Barrera, M. A. (2018) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acy043 · Cited by 44
Leading and Managing the Workplace: The Role of Executive Functions
Chan, T., Wang, I., & Ybarra, O. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0215 · Cited by 51
Williams, M. J., George-Jones, J., & Hebl, M. R. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000153 · Cited by 46
Adrian, J., Moessinger, M., Charles, A., & Postal, V. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.010 · Cited by 38
Martins, J. S., Bartholow, B. D., Cooper, M. L., Gunten, C. D. V., & Wood, P. K. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000324 · Cited by 43
Self-citationChiu, H., Chan, P.-T., Kao, C., Chu, H., Chang, P., Hsiao, S. S., Liu, D., Chang, W., & Chou, K. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13519 · Cited by 41
Machine-Learning-Assisted Descriptors Identification for Indoor Formaldehyde Oxidation Catalysts
Cao, X., Huang, J., Du, K., Tian, Y., Hu, Z., Luo, Z., Wang, J., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c01691 · Cited by 37
Stability of genetic and environmental influences on executive functions in midlife.
Gustavson, D. E., Panizzon, M. S., Elman, J. A., Franz, C. E., Reynolds, C. A., Jacobson, K. C., Friedman, N. P., Xian, H., Toomey, R., Lyons, M. J., et al. (2018) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000230 · Cited by 35
Self-citationWhat are the personality and trauma dynamics that contribute to posttraumatic growth?
Shuwiekh, H. A. M., Kira, I. A., & Ashby, J. S. (2017) · International Journal of Stress Management · doi:10.1037/str0000054 · Cited by 35
Reducing discrimination: A bias versus noise perspective.
Axt, J. R., & Lai, C. K. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000153 · Cited by 34
The sampling precision of research in five major areas of psychology
Trafimow, D., & Myüz, H. A. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1173-x · Cited by 35
Re-assessing the incremental predictive validity of Implicit Association Tests
Buttrick, N. R., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., & Huband, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103941 · Cited by 34
Race, weapons, and the perception of threat
Payne, B. K., & Correll, J. (2020) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.001 · Cited by 40
Self-citationCharacterising the unity and diversity of executive functions in a within-subject fMRI study
Saylık, R., Williams, A. L., Murphy, R. A., & Szameitat, A. J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11433-z · Cited by 46
Alcohol effects on response inhibition: Variability across tasks and individuals.
Bartholow, B. D., Fleming, K. A., Wood, P. K., Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Altamirano, L. J., Miyake, A., Martins, J. S., & Sher, K. J. (2018) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000190 · Cited by 39
Self-citationHimi, S. A., Volberg, G., Bühner, M., & Hilbert, S. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01700-z · Cited by 32
The Weapons Identification Task: Recommendations for adequately powered research
Rivers, A. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177857 · Cited by 29
Gustavson, D. E., Reynolds, C. A., Corley, R. P., Wadsworth, S. J., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001168 · Cited by 28
Self-citationHilgard, J., Bartholow, B. D., Dickter, C. L., & Blanton, H. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu060 · Cited by 29
Self-citationGustavson, D. E., Altamirano, L. J., Johnson, D. P., Whisman, M. A., & Miyake, A. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000212 · Cited by 29
Self-citationSeer, C., Sidlauskaite, J., Lange, F., Rodríguez‐Nieto, G., & Swinnen, S. P. (2021) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.203239 · Cited by 30
Gustavson, D. E., Lurquin, J., Michaelson, L., Barker, J. E., Carruth, N. P., von Bastian, C. C., & Miyake, A. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000584 · Cited by 28
Self-citationAdvancing the Understanding of the Factor Structure of Executive Functioning
Himi, S. A., Bühner, M., & Hilbert, S. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9010016 · Cited by 25
Sambol, S., Suleyman, E., Scarfo, J., & Ball, M. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103934 · Cited by 33
External motivation to avoid prejudice alters neural responses to targets varying in race and status
Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., Dang, T. P., & Cloutier, J. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx128 · Cited by 23
Gustavson, D. E., Franz, C. E., Panizzon, M. S., Reynolds, C. A., Xian, H., Jacobson, K. C., Toomey, R., Lyons, M. J., & Kremen, W. S. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618805075 · Cited by 22
Improving the reliability and validity of the IAT with a dynamic model driven by similarity
Kvam, P. D., Irving, L. H., Sokratous, K., & Smith, C. T. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02141-1 · Cited by 21
Nash Unsworth, A., Miller, A. L., & Strayer, D. L. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02516-1 · Cited by 26
Perspective matters: a systematic review of immersive virtual reality to reduce racial prejudice
Higgins, S., Alcock, S., Aveiro, B. D., Daniels, W. M. U., Farmer, H., & Besharati, S. N. (2024) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-024-01024-w · Cited by 26
Roye, S., Castagna, P. J., Calamia, M. R., Vito, A. N. D., Lee, T., & Greening, S. G. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107418 · Cited by 21
Cognitive Control Processes Underlying Individual Differences in Self-Control
Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801850-7.00015-9 · Cited by 21
Arnoult, M., Selimbegović, L., Hirschberger, G., Pyszczynski, T., & Chatard, A. (2023) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000337 · Cited by 24
When Practice Fails to Reduce Racial Bias in the Decision to Shoot: The Case of Cognitive Load
Singh, B., Axt, J. R., Hudson, S. M., Mellinger, C., Wittenbrink, B., & Correll, J. (2020) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2020.38.6.555 · Cited by 18
Self-citationNajdowski, C. J., & Goff, P. A. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12083 · Cited by 19
Nguyen, T. T. X., Criss, S., Allen, A. M., Glymour, M. M., Phan, L., Trevino, R., Dasari, S., & Nguyen, Q. C. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16101766 · Cited by 23
The common factor of executive functions measures nothing but speed of information uptakePreprint
Löffler, C., Frischkorn, G. T., Hagemann, D., Sadus, K., & Schubert, A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xvdyz · Cited by 15
Rocabado, F., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12110444 · Cited by 14
Risky decision making and cognitive flexibility among online sports bettors in Nigeria
Nweze, T., Agu, E. C., & Lange, F. (2020) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12663 · Cited by 14
Navon, M., Shechter, A., & Bar‐Anan, Y. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000275 · Cited by 12
Chaku, N., Hoyt, L. T., & Barry, K. R. (2021) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101119 · Cited by 14
Singh, L., Moh, Y., Ding, X., Lee, K., & Quinn, P. C. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105059 · Cited by 13
Dual process models of personality
Perugini, M., Hagemeyer, B., Wrzus, C., & Back, M. D. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813995-0.00020-0 · Cited by 11
Cheng, Y., Dwyer, P. S. R., & Keating, C. T. (2024) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613241290565 · Cited by 15
Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., Li, T., Dang, T. P., & Cloutier, J. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0039-18.2018 · Cited by 10
Implicit bias as unintentional discrimination
Asma, L. J. F. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04364-3 · Cited by 11
No elephant in the room: The incremental validity of implicit self‐esteem measures
Jusepeitis, A., & Rothermund, K. (2022) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12705 · Cited by 10
Dissociating automatic associations: Comparing two implicit measurements of race bias
Volpert‐Esmond, H. I., Scherer, L. D., & Bartholow, B. D. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2655 · Cited by 9
Self-citationElder, J., Wilson, L., & Calanchini, J. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231171256 · Cited by 11
Is the automatic evaluation of individual group members inherently biased by their group membership?
Navon, M., & Bar‐Anan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104491 · Cited by 9
Wrzus, C., Egloff, B., & Riediger, M. (2017) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000176 · Cited by 8
A Process Dissociation Model of Implicit Rapid Revision in Response to Diagnostic Revelations
Cone, J., & Calanchini, J. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220919208 · Cited by 7
Castro, S., Bukowski, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Wodniecka, Z. (2026) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2026.2651147 · Cited by 7
Clayton, K., Horrillo, J., & Sniderman, P. M. (2020) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2022.56 · Cited by 10
Do executive functions buffer against COVID-19 stress?
Ng, T. L. Y., Majeed, N. M., Lua, V. Y. Q., & Hartanto, A. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04652-8 · Cited by 7
Meißner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108885492.028 · Cited by 6
Yao, L., Zhang, B., Jin, D., Zhang, H., & Dang, J. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01849-7 · Cited by 10
Tell Me Who, and I’ll Tell You How Fair: A Model of Agent Bias in Justice Reasoning
Cojuharenco, I., Marques, T., & Patient, D. (2017) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601117729607 · Cited by 6
Reducing Discrimination: A Bias Versus Noise PerspectivePreprint
Axt, J. R., & Lai, C. K. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/v7ksz · Cited by 10
Awareness of implicit attitudes: Large-scale investigations of mechanism and scopePreprint
Morris, A., & Kurdi, B. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dmjfq · Cited by 6
Laukenmann, R., Erdfelder, E., Heck, D. W., & Moshagen, M. (2023) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2023.41.2.137 · Cited by 5
Standardized estimates for latent interaction effects: Method comparison and selection strategy
Wen, Z., Ouyang, J., & Fang, J. (2021) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.00091 · Cited by 6
Noteborn, M. G. C., Sijtsema, J. J., Denissen, J. J. A., & Bogaerts, S. (2024) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911241245009 · Cited by 5
The interplay of hot and cool executive functions: Implications for a unified executive framework
Sambol, S., Suleyman, E., & Ball, M. (2025) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101360 · Cited by 5
The Shape of ROC Curves in Shooter Tasks: Implications for Best Practices in Analysis
Rotello, C. M., Kelly, L. J., & Heit, E. (2018) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.171 · Cited by 4
Decoupling the Conflicting Evaluative Meanings in Automatically Activated Race-Based Associations
Allidina, S., Long, E. U., Baoween, W., & Cunningham, W. A. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231156029 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ito, T. A., Friedman, N. P., Bartholow, B. D., Correll, J., Loersch, C., Altamirano, L. J., & Miyake, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-218
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- PMC
- PMC4354845
- OpenAlex
- W2158144941
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 49.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS 0847872)
- National Institutes of Health (MH063207)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- implicit racial bias, executive function, cognitive control, automatic associations, individual differences, explicit bias, controlled processing, extrinsic motivation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association, Dangerous Behavior, Female, Humans, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saccades, Set, Psychology, Black People, White People, Young Adult, Executive Function, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
