Cited by 6Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessGambling Behavior and Treatments

Sociodemographic and psychiatric diagnostic predictors of 3-year incidence of DSM?IV substance use disorders among men and women in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

Open access
Goldstein, Risë B., Smith, Sharon M., Dawson, Deborah A., Grant, Bridget F.·2015·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Incidence rates of alcohol and drug use disorders (AUDs and DUDs) are consistently higher in men than women, but information on whether sociodemographic and psychiatric diagnostic predictors of AUD and DUD incidence differ by sex is limited. Using data from Waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, sex-specific 3-year incidence rates of AUDs and DUDs among United States adults were compared by sociodemographic variables and baseline psychiatric disorders. Sex-specific logistic regression models estimated odds ratios for prediction of incident AUDs and DUDs, adjusting for potentially confounding baseline sociodemographic and diagnostic variables. Few statistically significant sex differences in predictive relationships were identified and those observed were generally modest. Prospective research is needed to identify predictors of incident DSM-5 AUDs and DUDs and their underlying mechanisms, including whether there is sex specificity by developmental phase, in the role of additional comorbidity in etiology and course, and in outcomes of prevention and treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/adb0000080

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Grant BF Weissman MM Narrow WE First MB Sirovatka PJ Regier DA Epidemiology: Gender-related research findings, research gaps and research agenda for DSM-V Age and gender considerations in psychiatric diagnosis: a research agenda for DSM-V 2007 2007 American Psychiatric Press, Inc Arlington, VA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, R. B., Smith, S. M., Dawson, D. A., & Grant, B. F.
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2015-12
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
924-932
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2464132942
Cited by
6
References
50
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
substance use disorders, alcoholism, drug use disorders, incidence, sex differences, sociodemographic predictors, psychiatric comorbidity, DSM-IV, NESARC, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, United States, Incidence, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review