The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 211 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research
Open accessAbstract
Although in the early years of the Journal leadership research was rare and focused primarily on traits differentiating leaders from nonleaders, subsequent to World War II the research area developed in 3 major waves of conceptual, empirical, and methodological advances: (a) behavioral and attitude research; (b) behavioral, social-cognitive, and contingency research; and (c) transformational, social exchange, team, and gender-related research. Our review of this work shows dramatic increases in sophistication from early research focusing on personnel issues associated with World War I to contemporary multilevel models and meta-analyses on teams, shared leadership, leader-member exchange, gender, ethical, abusive, charismatic, and transformational leadership. Yet, many of the themes that characterize contemporary leadership research were also present in earlier research. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,424
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Salomon-Delatour, G., Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1948) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086579 · Cited by 11,302
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Self-citationGraen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision
Bass, B. M. (1990) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-s · Cited by 5,438
Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002 · Cited by 5,435
YUKL, G. A. (1981) · Cited by 5,266
Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 · Cited by 4,464
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 211 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614
Oc, B. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 · Cited by 573
Motivation related to work: A century of progress.
Kanfer, R., Fresé, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000133 · Cited by 600
Shared leadership: A state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda
Zhu, J., Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2296 · Cited by 487
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Claremont McKenna College (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lord, Robert G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 434-451
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2582495316
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 211
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 91.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Keywords
- leadership, history of leadership research, transformational leadership, social exchange theory, team leadership, shared leadership, leader-member exchange, gender and leadership, abusive leadership, charismatic leadership, ethical leadership, contingency theory, multilevel models, meta-analysis
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Leadership, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Applied, Research, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review