The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward.
Abstract
has played a vital role in the advancement of this topic over the last 100 years. Nevertheless, we suspect that to continue to play a leading role in advancing the science and practice of work design, the journal might need to publish research that is broader, more contextualized, and team-oriented. In the third section, we address the impact of work design research on: applied psychology and management, disciplines beyond our own, management thinking, work practice, and national policy agendas. Finally, we draw together observations from our analysis and identify key future directions for the field. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
Self-citationLean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Self-citation
Cited by
Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World
Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12241 · Cited by 960
Self-citationWorking from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework.
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172 · Cited by 547
Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 · Cited by 512
Self-citationVirtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters
Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020 · Cited by 426
Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0127 · Cited by 377
Self-citationEffectiveness of job crafting interventions: a meta-analysis and utility analysis
Oprea, B. T., Barzin, L., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Rusu, A. (2019) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1646728 · Cited by 193
Work design in future industrial production: Transforming towards cyber-physical systems
Waschull, S., Bokhorst, J. A. C., Molleman, E., & Wortmann, J. C. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.053 · Cited by 124
How work redesign interventions affect performance: An evidence-based model from a systematic review
Knight, C., & Parker, S. K. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726719865604 · Cited by 122
Self-citationThe SMART model of work design: A higher order structure to help see the wood from the trees
Parker, S. K., & Knight, C. (2024) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22200 · Cited by 108
Self-citationInteractive Effects of Team Virtuality and Work Design on Team Functioning
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419863490 · Cited by 88
Self-citationWorking from Home, Telework, and Psychological Wellbeing? A Systematic Review
Crawford, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141911874 · Cited by 64
“As an outcome of this review [12], there is recognition that proactive work designs can support more positive outcomes and reduce negative outcomes in workplaces.”
BackgroundOn the temporal stability of self-determined work motivation profiles: a latent transition analysis
Fernet, C., Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Austin, S., Gagné, M., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., & Forest, J. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1688301 · Cited by 61
Kittel, A. F. D., Kunz, R. A. C., & Seufert, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643748 · Cited by 52
The job perception inventory: Considering human factors and needs in the design of human-AI work
Berretta, S., Tausch, A., Peifer, C., & Kluge, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128945 · Cited by 35
“What is missing most in this discourse, both in the past and today, is how employees can continue to work in an AI-induced workplace that is conducive to motivation, wellbeing, and identity (Parker et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-420
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2586876323
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 67.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
